P A G E 1 | 3 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI BEFORE S/SHRI N.S SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 70 / RAN /201 7 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012 - 13 SRI PRAMOD KUMAR ROY, QR. NO.44, BOKARO STEEL CITY - 14. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE - III, B.S.CITY. PAN/GIR NO. ACDPR 9131 L (APPELLANT ) .. ( RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI A.K.MOHANTY, JCIT DATE OF HEARING : 29 / 11 / 2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 30 / 11 / 2018 O R D E R PER N.S.SAINI, AM THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A), HAZARIBAG, D ATED 16.2.2017 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012 - 13. 2. IN THIS CASE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE WAS INITIALLY FIXED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL ON 17.4.2010. THE ASSESSEE, HOWEVER, SOUGHT ADJOURNMENT ON THE SAID DATE. LATER ON ALSO, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSE ON 29.5.2018, 30. 5.2018. THE NOTICE OF ITA NO.70/RAN/2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012 - 13 P A G E 2 | 3 HEARING DATED 29.10.2018 FIXING THE HEARING ON 28.11.2018 IS RETURNED BACK UNSERVED BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES WITH THE REMARKS INCOMPLETE ADDRESS. THE ASSESSE HAS NOT FURNISHED THE CORRECT ADDRESS TO THE TRIBUNAL. HENCE, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO SERVE THE NOTICE OF HEARING ON THE ASSESSE. FROM THE ABOVE, WE INFER THAT THE ASSESSE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. WE, THEREFORE, DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE AS UNADMITTED FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF ITAT DE LHI IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. - MULTIPLAN INDIA PVT. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) . 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 30 / 11 /2018. SD/ - SD/ - ( PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) ( N.S SAINI) JUDICIALMEMBER A CCOUNTANT MEMBER RANCHI ; DATED 30 / 11 /2018 B.K.PARIDA, SPS ITA NO.70/RAN/2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012 - 13 P A G E 3 | 3 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER SR. PVT. SECRETARY, ITAT, RANCHI ON TOUR 1. THE APPELLANT : 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A) - 4. PR.CIT - RANCHI 5. DR, ITAT, RANCHI 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY//