VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKWY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA. NO. 703/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2009-10 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR CUKE VS. M/S SIDHE STAR BUILDHOME PVT. LTD., D-25, LAL BAHADUR NAGAR, J.L.N. MARG, JAIPUR LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AAKCS5106J VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI RAJ MEHARA (JCIT) FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI ROHAN SOGANI (CA) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 02/08/2018 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 02/08/2018 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT (A)- 4, JAIPUR DATED 16.03.2018 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 WHEREIN THE REVENUE HAS TAKEN THE FOLLOWING SOLE GROUND OF APPEAL:- 1. WHETHER ON THE FACTS AND IN THE CIRCUMSTANCE S OF THE CASE, THE CIT(A) WAS RIGHT IN DELETING THE ADDITION OF RS. 36,70,478/- MADE BY AO U/S 40(A)(IA) OF THE IT ACT, 1961. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESS EE HAS RAISED AN OBJECTION OF MAINTAINABILITY OF THE APPEAL OF THE R EVENUE DUE TO THE TAX EFFECT ITA NO. 703/JP/2018 DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR VS. M/S SIDHE STAR BUILDHOME PVT. LTD., JAIPUR 2 NOT EXCEEDING RS. 20 LACS AS PER THE CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018 DATED 11 TH JULY, 2018. 2.1. THE LD. D/R HAS FAIRLY SUBMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THE REVENUES APPEAL COMES TO RS 11,34,180/- LESS THAN 20 LACS WHICH IS PRESCRIBED THRESHOLD LIMIT IN TERMS OF THE CBDT CIR CULAR NO. 3/2018 DATED 11 TH JULY, 2018 ISSUED IN SUPERSESSION OF ITS EARLIER CI RCULAR NO. 21 OF 2015 DATED 10.12.2015. 3. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IT IS OBSERVED THAT THE DEMAN D/ TAX EFFECT IN THE REVENUES APPEAL IN QUESTION IS BELOW RS. 20.00 LAC S . UNDER THE POWERS VESTED BY SECTION. 268A(1) OF THE I T ACT, CBDT HAS RECENTLY ISSUED CIRCULAR NO. 3/2018 DATED 11 TH JULY, 2018 (F NO. 279/MISC. 142/2007-ITJ(PT) INSTRUCTING THE AUTHORITIES BELOW THAT DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE FILED BEFORE ITAT WHERE THE DEMAND/TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED RS. 20 LACS. THE CIRCULAR IS SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED TO BE APPLICABLE FOR ALL PEN DING APPEALS. 4. SUBJECT TO SOME EXCEPTIONS, IT IS FURTHER DIREC TED BY CBDT THAT ALL THE DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS PENDING BEFORE ITAT WHERE THE DEMAND/TAX EFFECT IS NOT EXCEEDING THAN 20 LACS SHOULD BE EITHER WITHDRA WN OR NOT PRESSED BY THE DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVES. 5. THE PRESENT APPEAL IS NOT COVERED BY ANY EXCEPT IONS MENTIONED IN THE SAID CBDT CIRCULAR. SINCE THE TAX DEMAND IN DISPUT E IN THIS DEPARTMENTAL ITA NO. 703/JP/2018 DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, JAIPUR VS. M/S SIDHE STAR BUILDHOME PVT. LTD., JAIPUR 3 APPEAL IS BELOW THE LIMIT SET OUT BY CBDT FOR THE A PPEAL, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF CBDT CI RCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018 DATED 11.07.2018. ACCORDINGLY THE APPEAL OF THE DEPARTMEN T IS DISMISSED AS NOT PRESSED/WITHDRAWN. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 02/08/2018. SD/- SD/- FOT; IKWY JKO FOE FLAG ;KNO (VIJAY PAL RAO) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 02/08/2018 * GANESH KR. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-03, JAIPUR 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- M/S SIDHE STAR BUILDHOME PVT. LTD., JAIPUR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE { ITA NO. 703/JP/2018} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR