Muyeenuddin Nawaz Jabbar, CHENNAI V. ACIT Non Corporate Circle 15(1), CHENNAI

ITA 706/CHNY/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2258 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 30 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 19-03-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: G CHANDRABABU
• Assessee Lawyers: S SRIDHAR
• Keywords: Competent authority; Condonation of delay
• Section: 6

Judgement Text

, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , A B ENCH, CHENNAI , . , % BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI G.MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO.706/CHNY/2019 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2014-15) MR. MUYEENUDDIN NAWAZ JABBAR, 24, HALLS TOWERS, 33, ANNA SALAI, EGMORE, CHENNAI-600 008. VS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NON-CORPORATE CIRCLE-15(1) CHENNAI. PAN:AMFPN 8677D ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : MR. S.SRIDHAR,ADVOCATE /RESPONDENT BY : MR. G.CHANDRABABU, ADDL CIT /DATE OF HEARING : 18.02.2021 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 18.02.2021 / O R D E R PER G.MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-15, CHENNAI DATED 27.02.2019 AND PE RTAINS TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15. 2. WE HAVE HEARD THE COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE AND T HE LD. DR AND ALSO PERUSED THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS MA DE A STATEMENT AT BAR THAT THE ASSESSEE WANTS TO UTILIZE THE DIR ECT TAXES VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 TO SETTLE PENDING DISPUTE RE LATING TO DIRECT TAXES AND IN THIS REGARD SOME OF ASSESSEES HAVE FI LED FORM NO 1 AND 2 AND AWAITING FORM NO. 3 FROM THE DESIGNATED A UTHORITY. IN 2 ITA NO.706/CHNY/2019 SOME CASES, THE ASSESSEES HAVE RECEIVED FORM NO. 3 FROM THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND IN SOME CASES, THE ASSESSE E HAVE FILED LETTER AND EXPRESSED THEIR WILLINGNESS TO FILE FORM NO. 1 AND 2 BEFORE THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY. 3. THE BENCH HAS CONSIDERED RIVAL CONTENTIONS OF BO TH SIDES AND AFTER HEARING BOTH PARTIES, WE FOUND THAT THE GOV ERNMENT OF INDIA HAS ANNOUNCED IN THE BUDGET, 2020, A DIRECT TAXES VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 TO SETTLE PENDING DISPUTE RELATING TO DIRECT TAXES AT VARIOUS APPELLATE FORUMS INCLUDI NG THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY, TRIBUNAL, HIGH COURT AND SU PREME COURT. IN THIS REGARD, THE SCHEME HAS BEEN NOTIFIED ON 17 TH MARCH, 2020 AND BECAME DIRECT TAXES VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020. A S PER THE SAID SCHEME, ASSESSEES ARE ALLOWED TO SETTLE DIRECT TAX DISPUTE IN A MANNER AND PROCEDURE PRESCRIBED THEREIN BY FILING N ECESSARY DECLARATION AND UNDERTAKING. THE SCHEME HAS ALSO SP ECIFIED THE AMOUNT OF TAXES, INTEREST, AND PENALTY, IF ANY PAYA BLE UNDER THE ACT. IF AN ASSESSEE FILED A DECLARATION AND PAY SPECI FIED TAXES AS PER THE SCHEME AND WITHDRAW THE APPEAL PENDING BEFOR E THE APPELLATE AUTHORITIES, THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY SHALL PASS AN ORDER IN FORM 5 3 ITA NO.706/CHNY/2019 CONFIRMING PAYMENT MADE UNDER THE SCHEME AND GRA NT IMMUNITY FROM PENALTY AND PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE PRESENT APPEALS, SOME ASSESSEES HAVE FIL ED DECLARATION IN FORM NO.1 ALONG WITH UNDERTAKING WAIVING RIGHTS FOR ANY REMEDY IN FORM NO. 2 TO THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND HAS ALSO RECEIVED FORM 3. IN SOME CASES, FORM NO 1 AND 2 HAS BEEN FIL ED AND AWAITING FORM NO. 3 FROM THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND IN SOM E CASES, THE ASSESSEES HAVE EXPRESSED THEIR WILLINGNESS TO FILE FORM NO. 1 AND 2 AND SETTLE THEIR DISPUTE UNDER THE SCHEME. THEREFOR E, ONCE THE ASSESSEES INTEND TO FILE A DECLARATION IN FORM NO. 1 ALONG WITH UNDERTAKING AND EXPRESSED THEIR WILLINGNESS TO SETT LE PENDING DISPUTES REGARDING DIRECT TAXES, THEN THERE IS NO P OINT IN KEEPING APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEES. WE, FURTHER NOTED THAT RECENTLY THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT OF MADRAS HAS C ONSIDERED AN IDENTICAL APPLICATION FILED BY AN ASSESSEE IN THE CASE OF M/S. NANNUSAMY MOHAN (HUF) VS. ACIT IN T.C.A NO.372 OF 2 020 FOR AVAILING THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020, WHERE THE HONBLE HIGH COURT HAS DISMISSED THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER AS WITHDRAWN, BUT ALLOWED LIBERTY TO THE ASSESSEE TO RESTORE THE APPEAL IN THE EVENT THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY FOR ANY REASON REJECT 4 ITA NO.706/CHNY/2019 APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE ACT. THE RELEVANT PORTIONS OF THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE HONBL E HIGH COURT OF MADRAS VIDE ORDER DATED 16.10.2020 ARE EXTRACTED AS UNDER:- 2. WE HAVE HEARD MR.M.P.SENTHIL KUMAR, LEARNED C OUNSEL APPEARING FOR THE APPELLANT/ASSESSEE AND MR.T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, LEARNED SENIOR STANDING COUNSEL AND MS. K.G.USHA RANI, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT/REVENUE. 3. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE , ON INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMITTED THAT THE APPELLANT / ASSESS EE INTENDS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME ( VVS SCHEME' FOR BREVITY) AND IN THIS REGARD, THE ASSESSEE IS TA KING STEPS TO FILE THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN FORM NO. 1. 4. IT MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THIS COURT TO DECIDE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW FRAMED FOR CONSIDERATI ON ON ACCOUNT OF CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS. THE GOV ERNMENT OF INDIA ENACTED THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS AC T, 2020 (ACT 3 OF 2020) TO PROVIDE FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTED TA X AND FOR MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO. THE ACT OF THE PARLIAMENT RECEIVED THE ASSENT OF THE PRESIDENT ON 17TH MARCH 2020 AND PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA ON 17TH MARCH 2020. 5. IN TERMS OF THE SAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN GIVEN AN OPTION TO PUT AN END TO THE TAX DISPUTES, WHICH MAY BE PENDING AT DIFFERENT LEVELS EITHER BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY OR BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL OR BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OR BEF ORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. UNDER SECTION 2(J) 'DISPUTED TAX' HAS BEEN DEFINED. IN TERMS OF SECTION 3, WHERE A DECLARANT MEANS A PERSON, WHO FILES A DECLARATION UNDER SECTI ON 4 ON OR BEFORE THE LAST DATE FILES A DECLARATION TO THE DES IGNATED AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4 IN R ESPECT OF TAX ARREARS, THEN, NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED I N THE INCOME TAX ACT OR ANY OTHER LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORC E, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE BY THE DECLARANT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN TER MS OF SECTION 3(A-C) THEREUNDER. 6. THE FIRST PROVISO TO SECTION 3 STATES THAT IN C ASE WHERE AN APPEAL OR WRIT PETITION OR SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION I S FILED BY THE INCOME TAX AUTHORITY ON ANY ISSUE BEFORE THE APPELL ATE FORUM, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE SHALL BE ONE-HALF OF THE AMOUNT IN THE TABLE STIPULATED IN SECTION 3 CALCULATED ON SUCH ISSUE, I N SUCH A 5 ITA NO.706/CHNY/2019 MANNER AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED. THE SECOND PROVISO DEA LS WITH THE CASES, WHERE THE MATTER IS BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) OR BEFORE THE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL. THE THIRD PROV ISO DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ISSUE IS PENDING BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. THE FILING OF THE DECLARATION IS AS PER SECTION 4 OF THE ACT AND THE PARTICULARS TO BE FURNISHED AR E ALSO MENTIONED IN THE SUB SECTIONS OF SECTION 4. SECTION 5 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH THE TIME AND MANNER OF THE PAYMENT AND S ECTION 6 DEALS WITH IMMUNITY FROM INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF OFFENCE AND IMPOSITION OF PENALTY IN CERTAIN CASES. SECTION 9 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ACT 3 OF 2020 W ILL NOT BE APPLICABLE. 7. AS OBSERVED, THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY TO RE STORE THIS APPEAL IN THE EVENT THE ULTIMATE DECISION TO BE TAK EN ON THE DECLARATION TO BE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTI ON 4 OF THE SAID ACT IS NOT IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. IF SUCH A PRAYER IS MADE, THE REGISTRY SHALL ENTERTAIN THE PRAYER WITHO UT INSISTING UPON ANY APPLICATION TO BE FILED FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL AND ON SUCH REQUEST MA DE BY THE ASSESSEE BY FILING A MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FOR RES TORATION, THE REGISTRY SHALL PLACE SUCH PETITION BEFORE THE DIVIS ION BENCH FOR ORDERS. 8. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE APPE LLANT / ASSESSEE TO FILE THE FORM NO.1 ON OR BEFORE 20.11.2020 AND T HE COMPETENT AUTHORITY SHALL PROCESS THE APPLICATION / DECLARATI ON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACT AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS AS EXPEDIT IOUSLY AS POSSIBLE PREFERABLY WITHIN A PERIOD OF SIX (6) WEEK S FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THE DECLARATION IS FILED IN THE PROPER FOR M. 5. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE DECISION OF THE HONBL E HIGH COURT OF MADRAS, AND BY TAKING NOTE OF THE FACT THAT SOME ASSESSEES HAVE ALREADY FILED DECLARATION IN FORM NO.1 ALONG WITH FORM NO.2 TO THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND RECEIVED FORM 3 AND SOM E ASSESSEES HAD ALREADY FILED FORM NO. 1 & 2 AND AWAITING FORM NO. 3 FROM THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY AND ALSO THE FACT THAT REMAINI NG ASSESSEES ARE WILLING TO FILE FORM NO. 1 AND 2 WITHIN THE DUE DAT E PRESCRIBED FOR THIS 6 ITA NO.706/CHNY/2019 PURPOSE, WE DISMISS THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSES SEES AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, A LIBERTY IS GIVEN TO THE ASSES SEES TO RESTORE THE APPEALS, IN THE EVENT OF THE DESIGNATED AUTH ORITY, FOR ANY REASON REJECT THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE SAID ACT. 6. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS D ISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18 TH FEBRUARY, 2021 SD/- SD/- ( ) ( . ) (MAHAVIR SINGH) (G. MANJUNATHA ) / VICE-PRESIDENT $ / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & /CHENNAI, ' /DATED 18 TH FEBR UARY, 2021 DS )* +* /COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. , () /CIT(A) 4. , /CIT 5. * 1 /DR 6. /GF .