MAPSOR ADVERTISING & EVENT P LTD., Jaipur V. ITO, Jaipur

ITA 706/JPR/2013

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 126 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2003 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 7 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-03-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 16-08-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: J C KULHARI JCIT DHK

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKWO] U;KF;D LNL; ,O A JH HKKXPUN KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI BHAGCHAND, A M VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 706/JP/2013 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10. M/S. MAPSOR ADVERTISING & EVENT PVT. LTD., C-14, PANCHSHEEL COLONY, AJMER ROAD, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. AAECM 1190 D VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE (DATE WAS NOTED) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SHRI J.C. KULHARI (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 20.03.2018 ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 23/03/2018. VKNS'K@ ORDER PER SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER DATED 1 ST MAY, 2013 OF LD. CIT (A)-I, JAIPUR FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 09-10. NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING DESPITE THE FACT THAT ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING, THE HEARING WAS ADJOUR NED AT THE REQUEST OF THE LD. A/R OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE WAS ALSO REQUIRED TO FILE TWO SETS OF PAPER BOOKS. HOWEVER, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE HAS COMPLIED WITH THE EARLIER DIRECTIONS NOR ANYBODY HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY REQU EST FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN FILED. ACCORDINGLY, WE ARE SATISFIED THAT THE ASSES SEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLL OWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., (1991) 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO 2 ITA NO. 706/JP/2013 M/S. MAPSOR ADVERTISING & EVENT PVT. LTD., JAIPUR. ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN T HE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT (1997) 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE DI SMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 23/03/201 8. SD/- SD/- HKKXPUN FOT; IKY JKWO (BHAGCHAND) ( VIJAY PAL RAO ) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 23/03/2018. DAS/ VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- M/S. MAPSOR ADVERTISING & EVENT P. L TD., JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO WARD 2(2), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 706/JP/2013} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR