VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 707/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012-13 SMT. SUSHILA BOTHRA A-86, JANTA COLONY, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-5(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. AOHPB 3268 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI S.C. JAIN (C.A.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 19/05/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 19/05/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A)-2, JAIPUR DATED 30.04.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. 2. HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDE O CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEM IC. ITA NO. 707/JP/2019 SMT. SUSHILA BOTHRA VS. ITO 2 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLI CATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SA ID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- MAY PLEASE YOUR HONOR, IN THE MATTER OF ABOVE NAMED APPELLANT IN WHOSE CAS E AN APPEAL WAS FILED AND WAS PLACED FOR HEARING AND WAS REQUES TED TO BE ADJOURNED FOR THE REASON THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD MOVE D APPLICATION FOR SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES AS PER SCHEME NOTIFIED B Y THE GOVERNMENT UNDER DTVSV-2020. THE APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE AUTHORITY HAS BEEN APPROVED AND THE ASSESSEE ACKNOWLEDGE HAVING RECEIVED THE ORDER IN FORM NO. 3 VIDE ACKNOWLEDGMENT NO. 231917220290121 AND ACCOR DINGLY THE DISPUTE STANDS SETTLED AS PER SCHEME. THE ASSESSEE IS TO FILE FORM NO. 4 BEFORE THE DESIG NATED AUTHORITY FOR FINAL ORDER AND THEREFORE, IT IS PRAYED BEFO . RE THE BENCH THAT THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE BENCH MAY KINDLY BE TRE ATED AS WITHDRAWN SINCE THE DISPUTE STANDS SETTLED UNDER TH E SCHEME. NO ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEAL SO FILED IS REQUIRED TO BE MADE AND THE SAME BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN. (S.C. JAIN) A.R. OF THE ASSESSEE 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. ITA NO. 707/JP/2019 SMT. SUSHILA BOTHRA VS. ITO 3 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDE R VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSE D AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 19/05/2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 19/05/2021. * SANTOSH. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SMT. SUSHILA BOTHRA, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-5(2), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 707/JP/2019} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR