MAHESH GOYAL, Ajmer V. DCIT, Ajmer

ITA 708/JPR/2014

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 107 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6241 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 6 year(s) 10 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 13-09-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 1999-2000
• Appeal Filed On: 17-10-2014
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RAJENDRA SINGH

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO.708/JP/2014 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 1999-2000 SHRI PANKAJ GOYAL, L/H MAHESH GOYAL, OM PRAKASH VISHNUDUTT, SITARAM BAZAR, KESARGUNJ, AJMER. CUKE VS. THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. ACNPG 4359 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MANISH AGARWAL (C.A.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI RAJENDRA SINGH (CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 10/09/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 13/09/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A) JAIPUR DATED 06.08.2014 FOR THE ASS ESSMENT YEAR 1999- 2000. 2. HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDE O CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEM IC. ITA NO. 708/JP/2014 SHRI PANKAJ GOYAL VS. DCIT 2 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLI CATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SA ID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- KINDLY REFER TO THE CAPTIONED APPEAL FIXED FOR HE ARING BEFORE THE HONBLE BENCH ON 10.09.2021. IN THE MATTER, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT FORM 3 IS ISSUE D BY THE CIT IN RESPONSE TO APPLICATION IN FORM 1 & 2 UNDER VIVAD T O VISHWAS SCHEME BY THE ASSESSEE, COPY OF FORM 3 ENCLOSED. IT IS THEREFORE, HUMBLY REQUESTED TO PLEASE ALLOWED THE APPELLANT TO WITHDRAW THE PRESENT APPEAL. INCONVENIENCE CAUSED IS EXTREMELY REGRETTED. THANKING YOU, YOUR FAITHFULLY, MANISH AGARWAL A/R 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDE R VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSE D AS WITHDRAWN. ITA NO. 708/JP/2014 SHRI PANKAJ GOYAL VS. DCIT 3 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 13/09/2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 13/09/2021. * SANTOSH. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI PANKAJ GOYAL, AJMER. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, AJMER. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 708/JP/2014} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR