, , , , C, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT AHMEDABAD, C BENCH . .. . . .. . , !' !' !' !', , , , #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'( #$ %&'(, , , , )* + ) )* + ) )* + ) )* + ) ' ' ' ' BEFORE S/SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT AND ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA NO.71/AHD/2010 [ASSTT.YEAR : 2006-2007] M/S. PERFECT COLOURANTS & PLASTICS PVT. LTD. 85, GIDC, WAGHODIA, DIST: BARODA. PAN : AABCP 2646 M /VS. ITO, WARD-4(2) BARODA. ( (( (-. -. -. -. / APPELLANT) ( (( (/0-. /0-. /0-. /0-. / RESPONDENT) 1& 2 3 )/ ASSESSEE BY : NONE + 2 3 )/ REVENUE BY : SHRI VINOD TANWANI 5 2 &(*/ DATE OF HEARING : 14 TH MAY, 2012 678 2 &(*/ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 1-06-2012 )9 / O R D E R PER G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT: THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007 IS DIREC TED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD CIT(A)-III, BARODA DATED 15.10.2009 . 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THERE WAS NO APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE THROUGH DEPARTME NTAL REPRESENTATIVES OFFICE. COPY OF THE NOTICE HAVING BEEN SENT BY THE DR-OFFICE AND RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE IS PLACED ON RECORD. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT FILED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNM ENT OF THE CASE OR INTIMATED REASONS FOR THE NON-APPEARANCE IN THE MAT TER. IN THE ITA NO.71/AHD/2010 -2- CIRCUMSTANCES, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSING ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECIS ION OF DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. 38 ITD 320 , WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE. SD/- SD/- ( %&' %&' %&' %&'( (( ( / ANIL CHATURVEDI) )* + )* + )* + )* + /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . .. . . .. . /G.C. GUPTA) !' !' !' !' /VICE-PRESIDENT C OPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1) : APPELLANT 2) : RESPONDENT 3) : CIT(A) 4) : CIT CONCERNED 5) : DR, ITAT. BY ORDER DR/AR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD