IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH B , LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI S UNIL KUMAR YADAV , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI. A. K. GARODIA , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 715/LKW/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010 - 11 ASSTT. CIT CENTRAL CIRCLE II LUCKNOW V. M/S SHY AM PRODUCTS 255/62, KUNDRY RAKABGANJ LUCKNOW T AN /PAN : ABUFS4826R (APP ELL ANT) (RESPONDENT) APP ELL ANT BY: SHRI. AMIT NIGAM, D.R. RESPONDENT BY: NONE DATE OF HEARING: 18 01 201 6 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 03 02 201 6 O R D E R PER SUNIL KUMAR YADAV: THIS APPEAL IS PREFERRED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) ON VARIOUS GROUNDS. 2 . NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. BUT, ON A CAREFUL PERUSAL OF THE GROUNDS RAISED IN THIS APPEAL, WE FIND THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL I S LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS, THEREFORE, THIS APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN VIEW OF THE CIRCULAR OF THE CBDT BEARING NO. 21 OF 2015 DATED 10 TH DECEMBER, 2015, IN WHICH THE CBDT HAS TAKEN A DECISION TO WITHDRAW ALL THE APPEALS FILED BY THE REVENUE , IN WHICH TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IS LESS THAN RS.10 LAKHS. THOUGH THE REVENUE WAS DIRECTED BY THE BOARD TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL, BUT NO STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN BY THE REVENUE TILL DATE. WE ARE, THEREFORE, OF THE VIEW THAT THIS APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS NOT MA INTAINABLE IN THE LIGHT OF THE : - 2 - : AFORESAID CIRCULAR OF CBDT AND THEREFORE, WE DISMISS THE SAME BEING NOT MAINTAINABLE. 3 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENT I ONED ON THE CAPTION ED PAGE. SD/ - SD/ - [ A. K. GARODIA ] [ S UNIL KUMAR Y ADAV ] ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 3 RD 1 . APPELLANT FEBR UARY, 2016 JJ: 1501 COPY FORWARDED TO: 2 . RESPONDENT 3 . CIT(A) 4 . CIT 5 . DR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR