आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘सी’ ायपीठ, चे ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI ी वी दुगा राव, ाियक सद एवं डॉ एम.एल. मीना, लेखा सद के सम% BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Dr. M.L. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.1133/Chny/2018 & आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.724 /Chny/2019 िनधा रण वष /Assessment Years: 2014-15 Shri Reji Abraham, No.113, Janapriya Crest, Pantheon Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. [PAN: ADQPR 6864A] Vs. The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-1(1), Chennai. (अपीलाथ(/Appellant) ()*थ(/Respondent) अपीलाथ( की ओर से/ Appellant by : Mr. N. Arjun Raj, C.A )*थ( की ओर से /Respondent by : Mr. G. Johnson, Addl. CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 10.11.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 10.11.2021 आदेश / O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao, Judicial Member : These two appeals filed by the assessee are directed against the orders of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Chennai dated 26.02.2018 & 07.03.2019 relevant to the Assessment Year 2014-15. I.T.A Nos.1133/Chny/2018 & 724/Chny/2019 :- 2 -: 2. When these appeals were taken up for hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee is not interested in prosecting both the appeals and thus, the ld. counsel prayed for permission to withdraw the appeals filed by the assessee. 3. In view of the above submissions of the ld. Counsel for the assessee and there being no objection raised by the ld. DR, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 10 th November, 2021 in Chennai. Sd/- Sd/- (एम .एल. मीना) (M.L. MEENA) लेखा सद /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (वी द ु गा राव) (V. DURGA RAO) याियक याियक याियक याियक सद य सद यसद य सद य/JUDICIAL MEMBER चे ई/Chennai, दनांक/Dated: 10 th November, 2021. EDN/- आदेश क ितिलिप अ ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ(/Appellant 2. )*थ(/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु0 (अपील)/CIT(A) 4. आयकर आयु0/CIT 5. िवभागीय )ितिनिध/DR 6. गाड फाईल/GF