, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH G, NEW DELHI ! ! ! ! ' '' ' ' '' '! ! ! ! % % % % & & & & BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM & SH .R.K.PANDA, AM ! ! ! !' '' ' / ITA NO.731/DEL/2018 '' '' '' '' / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 ANJU JAKHMOLA, C/O-ARUN KETAN & ASSOCIATES, 101, CSC, DDA MARKET, PUSHPANJALI, NEW DELHI-110092. PAN-AFYPJ5500P .......... () /APPELLANT VS THE DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA. . *+() / RESPONDENT (),- / APPELLANT BY : SH.MAYANK MAHESHWARI, ADV. *+(),- / RESPONDENT BY : SH.S.S.RANA, CIT DR , ./% / DATE OF HEARING: 16.12.2019 01,./% / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 18 .12.2019 / ORDER PER SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM: THE APPEAL FILED BY ASSESSEE IS AGA INST ORDER OF CIT(A)- IV, KANPUR DATED 07.11.2017 RELATING TO ASSESSMEN T YEAR 2014-15. 2 ITA NO.731/DEL/2018 ASSESS MENT YEAR: 2014-15 2. IN THIS APPEAL, THE ASSESSEE IS AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF CIT(A) FOR DECIDING THE APPEAL EX-PARTE QUA THE ASSESSEE AND WITHOUT GOING INTO THE MERITS OF THE ADDITION. 3. THE LEARNED AR FOR THE ASSESSEE POINTED OUT THAT THE CIT(A) HAS PASSED THE EX-PARTE ORDER WITHOUT ALLOWING SUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY OF H EARING AND WITHOUT GOING INTO THE MERITS OF THE CASE. 4. THE LEARNED DR FOR THE REVENUE ON THE OTHER HAND POINTED OUT THAT SUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY HAS BEEN AFFORDED TO THE ASS ESSEE. 5. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND PERUSED THE RECORD. UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 250(6) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (IN SHORT ACT), IT IS INCUMBENT UPON THE CIT(A) TO DECIDE THE APPEA L AFTER HEARING THE PARTIES AND STATE THE POINTS FOR DETERMINATION, THE DECISION THEREON AND ALSO THE REASONS FOR THE DECISION. WHILE DECIDING T HE APPEAL, CIT(A) HAS NO POWER TO DISMISS THE APPEAL FOR NON PROSECUTION BY RELYING ON THE RATIO/S LAID DOWN IN CIT VS. B.N. BHATTACHARYA & ANOTHER 11 8 ITR 461 (SC) AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKER VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP). IN THESE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES, WHERE THE CIT(A) HAD DISMISSED THE A PPEAL BY APPLYING THE ABOVE SAID RATIOS, THE ORDER OF THE LEARNED CIT(A) SUFFERS FROM INFIRMITY. THE CIT(A) WHILE DECIDING THE ISSUE ON MERITS HAVE ALSO TO GIVE REASONS FOR COMING TO THE CONCLUSION AND IN THE ABSENCE OF THE SAME, THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) AGAIN SUFFERS FROM INFIRMITY. IN THE PRESENT APPEAL, WE FIND THAT THE CIT(A) HAS DISMISSED THE APPEAL EX-PARTE QUA THE ASSESSEE AND HAD FAILED TO DECIDE THE APPEAL BY PASSING REASONED ASSESSMENT OR DER. 3 ITA NO.731/DEL/2018 ASSESS MENT YEAR: 2014-15 6. ACCORDINGLY, WE SET ASIDE THE MATTER BACK TO THE FILE OF THE CIT(A) WITH DIRECTION TO THE CIT(A) TO DECIDE THE ISSUE ON MERI TS BY A REASONED ORDER, AFTER AFFORDING REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING T O THE ASSESSEE. FURTHER THE ASSESSEE IS ALSO DIRECTED TO APPEAR BEFORE THE CIT(A) AND PARTICIPATE IN THE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS. THE APPEAL IS THUS DEC IDED ON THIS PRELIMINARY ISSUE WITHOUT GOING INTO THE MERITS OF THE ADDITION . 7. HENCE THIS APPEAL IS RESTORED BACK TO THE FILE O F CIT(A) TO DECIDE THE ISSUE ON MERITS AFTER AFFORDING REASONABLE OPPORTUN ITY OF HEARING TO THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE IS ALSO DIRECTED TO COMPLY W ITH NOTICES ISSUED BY THE CIT(A). THE PRELIMINARY ISSUE RAISED IN THIS APPEA L IS THUS DECIDED IN FAVOUR OF ASSESSEE. SINCE THE APPEAL IS BEING DECID ED ON THE PRELIMINARY ISSUE, WE ARE NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE RAISED ON ME RIT. 8. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS A LLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019. SD/- SD/- (R.K.PANDA) (SUSHMA CHOWL A) % % % % /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER / ! DATED : 18 TH DECEMBER, 2019 . * AMIT KUMAR * 4 ITA NO.731/DEL/2018 ASSESS MENT YEAR: 2014-15 ,*.343.5 COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. () / THE APPELLANT 2. *+() / THE RESPONDENT 3. 6 7 8 / THE CIT(A) 4. 9 6 / THE PR. CIT 5. 6. 3:;*. / DR, ITAT, DELHI ;'<5 GUARD FILE. / BY ORDER , +3.*. // TRUE COPY // >? , ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI