Shri Guru Nanak Dev Ji Charitable Eye &, Distt.Bathinda V. The Income-tax Officer, Bathinda

ITA 735/ASR/2013

• Counselvise Citation: 73520914 RSA 2013
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-03-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 16-12-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR. BEFORE SH. H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. B.P. JAIN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 735 (ASR)/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2009-10 PAN: BJVPS4152G AMARJIT SINGH, SHRI GURU NANAK VS. THE INCOME TA X OFFICER, DEV JI CHARITABLE EYE & GEN. WARD-1(3), BHATIND A HOSPITAL, BHAGTA BHAI KA, TEHSIL RAMPURA PAUL, DISTRICT-BHATINDA (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) DATE OF HEARING: 18.03.2014 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 18.03.2014 ORDER PER BENCH 1) THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL AGAINST IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.09.2013 PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER O F INCOME TAX (APPEALS), BATHINDA, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-1 0. 2) AS PER RECORD, THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE PRESEN T APPEAL ON 16.12.2013 AND THE REGISTRY HAS POINTED OUT FOLLOWI NG DEFECTS IN THE PRESENT APPEAL AND COMMUNICATED TO THE ASSESSEE VID E DEFECT MEMO DATED 08.01.2014: I. (MINOR HEAD) I 2 II. 6 8 ! I 3) THE REGISTRY HAS ALSO SENT REMINDER DATED 20.02.2 014 TO THE ASSESSEE POINTING OUT THE AFORESAID DEFECTS, IN SPI TE OF THIS THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT RECTIFIED THE SAME SO FAR. 4) KEEPING IN VIEW THE AFORESAID FACTS AND CIRCUMST ANCES THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT RECTIFIED THE DEFECTS AS POINTED O UT BY THE REGISTRY VIDE DEFECT MEMO, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE ASSESSEE I S NOT INTERESTED TO PROSECUTE THE MATTER IN DISPUTE. THEREFORE, THE PRE SENT APPEAL IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE, BEING DEFECTIVE WITH THE LIBERTY TO THE ASSESSEE TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER, IF SO ADVI SED, BUT ONLY AFTER RECTIFYING THE DEFECTS AS POINTED OUT BY THE REGIST RY IN THE SAID DEFECT MEMO AND THE APPLICATION WOULD BE DECIDED UNDER THE LAW. 5) IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE, BEING DEFECTIVE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18 TH MARCH, 2014 SD/./- SD/./- (B.P. JAIN) (H.S. SIDHU) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 18 TH MARCH, 2014 /RK/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 3 1. THE ASSESSEE: AMARJIT SINGH, SHRI GURU NANAK DEV JI CHARITABLE EYE & GEN. HOSPITAL, BHAGTA BHAI KA, TEHSIL RAMPURA PAUL, DISTRICT- BHATINDA 2. ITO, WARD-1(3), BHATINDA 3. THE CIT(A), 4. THE CIT, 5. THE SR DR, I.T.A.T., TRUE COPY BY ORDER (ASSISTANT REGISTRAR) INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AMRITSAR BENCH: AMRITSAR.