Jaya Hind Industries Ltd, Pune V. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle - 9, Pune

ITA 738/PUN/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5001 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 2 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-07-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 23-04-2018
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH, PUNE SHRI S.S. GODARA, JM AND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, AM ITA No. 738 and 739/PUN/2018 A.Y. 2012-13 and 2013-14 Jaya Hind Industries Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai Pune Road, Akurdi, PUNE – 411 035 PAN; AAACJ 4268 Q Appellant Vs. The Asstt. CIT Cir. 9, Pune Respondent CORRIGENDUM PER S.S. GODARA, JM : These assessee’s twin appeals for A.Y. 2012-13 and 2013-14 have been disposed of by this Bench vide its order dated 15-07-2022. However, we find that while mentioning the cause title it has been wrongly mentioned as under: “ITA No. 238 and 739/PUN/2018: A.Y. 2012-13 and 2013-14” 2. However, it is seen that the correct I.T.A No. and its corresponding assessment year have been wrongly mentioned and the same should be read follows: ITA No. 738/PUN/2018 : A.Y. 2013-14 and ITA No. 739/PUN/2018: A.Y. 2012-13” 3. It is also noticed that while uploading the Tribunal order on the website, the relevant correction made on page 1 line three under the heading ITA No. 739/PUN/2018 for A.Y. 2012-13, has not been carried out. We therefore, direct that word “80-G” should be read in place of word “80B”. We order accordingly. 3. Further, para 10 of the said order dated 15 th July 2022 should be replaced with the following paragraph. 2 ITA No. 738 and 739/PUN/2018 Jaya Hind Industries A.Y. 2012-13 and 2013-14 “10. To sum up, assessee’s former appeal ITA No. 738/PUN/2018 for A.Y. 2013-14 is partly allowed and latter case ITA No. 739/PUN/2018 for A.Y. 2012-13 is allowed in above terms. A copy of this order be placed in the respective file. Ordered accordingly.” Hence this corrigendum is issued. Order pronounced in the open Court on this 21 st day of July 2022 sd/- sd/- (DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE) (SATBEER SINGH GODARA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune; Dated, this 21 st day of July 2022 Ankam Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant. 2. The Respondent. 3. The CIT (A)-6, Pune. 4. The Pr. CIT – 5, Pune 5. The D.R. ITAT A’ Bench, Pune. 5. Guard File BY ORDER, Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Pune. 3 ITA No. 738 and 739/PUN/2018 Jaya Hind Industries A.Y. 2012-13 and 2013-14 Date 1 Draft dictated on Sr.PS 2 Draft placed before author Sr.PS 3 Draft proposed and placed before the second Member JM/AM 4 Draft discussed/approved by second Member AM/JM 5 Approved draft comes to the Sr. PS Sr.PS 6 Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr.PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order