IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , C BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE : SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M.BALAGANESH , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 7381 /MUM/ 20 17 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR :2012 - 13 ) M/S. PATHIK OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., 1 ST FLOOR, RECORD ROOM, CAR PARKING BLOCK F - 78 INDUSTRIAL AREA PARBATPURA, AJMER RAJASTHAN 305 002 VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 13(1)(3) MUMBAI PAN/GIR NO. AABCP7340N (APPELLANT ) .. (RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY NONE REVENUE BY MS. SHREEKALA PARDESHI DATE OF HEARING 02/08 /2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 02 / 08 /202 1 / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M) : THIS APPEAL IN ITA NO. 7381/MUM/2017 FOR A.Y. 2012 - 13 ARISES OUT OF THE ORDER BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - 21, MUMBAI IN APP EAL NO. CIT(A) - 21/ITO - 13(1)(3)/IT - 207/2015 - 16 DATED 30/10/2017 (LD. CIT(A) IN SHORT) AGAINST THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT PASSED U/S.143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS ACT) DATED 25/03/2015 BY THE LD. INCOME TAX OFFICER 13(1)(3), MUMB AI (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS LD. AO). ITA NO . 7381/MUM/2017 M/S. PRATIK OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., 2 2. WE FIND THAT THE LD. AR FILED A LETTER DATED 21/06/2021 MENTIONING THAT ASSESSEE HAD PREFERRED AN APPLICATION UNDER DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME 2020 TO SETTLE THIS TAX DISPUTE FOR THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERA TION AND HAD OBTAINED FORM - 5 FROM THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY THEREON, COPY OF WHICH WAS ENCLOSED ALONGWITH THIS LETTER. LD. DR ALSO AGREED THAT THE FORM - 5 HAS BEEN RECEIVED. 3. IN VIEW OF T HIS, WE HEREBY DISMISS THE APPEAL PENDING BEFORE US . 4. IN THE RES ULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN . ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 02/08/2021. SD/ - ( VIKAS AWASTHY ) SD/ - (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED 02 / 08 / 2021 KARUNA , SR.PS ITA NO . 7381/MUM/2017 M/S. PRATIK OVERSEAS PVT. LTD., 3 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, ( ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A), MUMBAI. 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY//