IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C NEW DLEHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.7416/DEL/2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11 COTEC HEALTHCARE PVT. LTD. VS. DCIT, CIRCLE-1, PRADEEP & CO. TAX ADVOCATES, GHAZIABAD. 7, NAVYUG MARKET, GHAZIABAD. PAN : AAACC8454D (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY: SH. M. BARANWAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING: 10/02/2021 DATE OF ORDER : 10/02/2021 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, V.P. THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2015-16 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-43, NEW DE LHI DATED 31.10.2019. 2. NONE IS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF VIRTUAL HEARING BEFORE US. THE ASSESSEE, VIDE ITS LETTER DA TED 28.01.2021, RECEIVED THROUGH EMAIL, HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY HIM AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE TH E DISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERA TION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. 2 3. CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTION ED APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. 4. HOWEVER, THE AFORESAID IS SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT TH AT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED A SSESSMENT YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE ACT, THE ASSESS EE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPE AL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. THE REVENUE HAS NO OBJECTION WITH REGARD TO THE AFORESAID CAVEAT. 5. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSIGNE D TO RECORD AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMISSED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIR TUAL HEARING ON 10 TH FEBRUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- (K. NARASIMHA CHARY) (G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE- PRESIDENT DATED: 10/02/2021 AKS