IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “A” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./I. T. A. No. 7419/ De l/ 2019 ( नधा रण वष / As s es s ment Yea r : 2012-13) A n ura g P ha r ma c eu ti c al s P vt . L td . G - 14 0 , S e ct or -1 0, D LF F ar id a b a d बनाम/ V s . I TO W ar d- 1 ( 2) F a ri d a b a d थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./P A N / G IR N o . A A G C A 5 0 5 9 G (अपीलाथ /Appellant) . . ( यथ / Respondent) अपीलाथ ओर से /Appellant by : Sh. Amit Singh, Director यथ क ओर से / Respondent by : Sh. Kanav Bali, SR DR स ु नवाई क तार ख / D a t e o f H e a r i ng 28/06/2022 घोषणा क तार ख /D a te o f P r o n o u nc e me n t 28/06/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM: T he c a p t i on e d a pp e al h as b ee n fi l e d a t t he i ns t a n c e o f t he a s s es s e e a ga in s t t he or de r o f th e Co m mi s s i on e r o f In c o m e T a x (A p pe a l s ), F ar id a ba d ( ‘C IT (A ) ’ i n s ho r t ) , d a t e d 28.0 6 . 2 0 19 c on c e r n i n g A Y 2 012 -1 3. 2. T he c a pt io n e d a s s e s s ee ha s s o u gh t t o w it hd r aw t he a pp e a l l i st e d a b o v e o n th e gro u n d th a t a s s es s e e h a s op t e d t o a v a i l b e n e fi t s o f ‘V i v a d s e V is h w a s S ch e m e, 2 02 0’ (V S V ). A s pe r l et t e r fi l e d by a s s es s e e, i t i s s ubm i t t e d t h a t a s se s s e e do es no t s eek to p urs u e t he s a id a p p ea l o w i n g t o e x e rc is e o f op t i on f o r a va i l ing V S V S c he m e a nd c o ns e q u en t l y re qu e s t ed t ha t a s s e s s ee ’s ap p l i c a ti on fo r w i th d ra w a l o f a p pe a l ma y p l e a se be g r a nt ed . 3. T he l d. D e pa r t me n t al R e p r es e n t a t i ve fo r t he R e v enu e s t a t e d t ha t h e h as no ob j ec t i o n t o w it h d r a w t h e a pp e al s i n t h e c ir cu ms t a n c e s na rr a te d o n be h al f o f t h e a s s ess e e. 4. In t he l ig h t o f w r it t en r eq ue s ts ma de o n be ha l f o f t he c ap ti on e d p a rt y, t h e a p p e a l is di s mi s s ed a s w i t hd r aw n. H ow e ve r, in t he e ve nt , t h e a s s es s e e fa i l s to a v a il t h e ben e f it o f V S V Sc he me for a ny bo na fi d e r e a s o n s, th en t he a s s es s e e c on c e r n e d wi l l be a t l i b er ty t o s ee k re s to r a t i on o f or ig i n a l a ppe a l for h ea r i n g b e fo r e IT A T i n a cc or da n ce w it h l a w . 5. In th e re s ul t , t he ca pt i on e d a p p e al i s d i s m is s e d a s w i t hdr a w n. Sd/- Sd/- (K UL BHARA T) (PRADI P KUM AR KEDI A) JUDI CI AL M EMBER ACCOU NT ANT MEM BER Dated: /06/2022 *Neha, Sr. Private Secretary Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI This Order pronounced on 28 /06/2022