VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH DQY HKKJR] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS [KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YAD AV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 746/JP/2015 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09. M/S. EID MOHD. NIZAMUDDIN, SUBHASH BAZAR, TONK. CUKE VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS)-3, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. AAAFI 4581 L VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI HEMANG GARGIEYA (ADVOCATE) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SHRI RAGHUVIR SINGH DAGUR (ADDL. CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 27.07.2016. ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28/07/2016. VKNS'K@ ORDER PER SHRI KUL BHARAT, J.M. THE APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT (APPEALS)- III, JAIPUR DATED 13.10.2015. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSE SSEE SUBMITTED THAT HE WISH TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AS INSTRUCTED BY THE ASSESSEE. WE FIND THAT THE LD. A/R HAS ALSO FILED A COPY OF LETTER DATED 11 TH APRIL, 2016 SEEKING WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. THE LD. D/R HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE A PPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWAN. 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. 2 ITA NO. 746/JP/2015 M/S. EID MOHAMMED NIZUMUDDIN ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28/07/2 016. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO ( DQY HKKJR ) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) ( KUL BHARAT ) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER . JAIPUR DATED:- /07/2016. DAS/ VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT- M/S. EID MOHAMMED NIZAMUDDIN, TO NK.. 2. THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO (TDS)-III, JAIPUR. 3. THE CIT(A). 4. THE CIT, 5. THE DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 746/JP/2015) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR