PURANMAL SAINI, Jaipur V. ITO, Alwar

ITA 75/JPR/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4377 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 3 month(s) 12 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-05-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 23-01-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARY ACIT

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 75/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 SHRI PURANMAL SAINI 36- SHIVAJI PARK, NEAR HOMEOPATHIC COLLEGE, ALWAR. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-1(4), ALWAR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. AEVPS 5943 K VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI DEVANG GARGIEYA (ADV.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY (ACIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 23/04/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 05/05/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A), ALWAR DATED 25.11.2016 FOR THE ASS ESSMENT YEAR 2011- 12. 2. HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDE O CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEM IC. ITA NO. 75/JP/2017 SHRI PURANMAL SAINI VS. ITO 2 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLI CATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SA ID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER:- HONBLE SIR, IN THIS CONNECTION, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT WE HAVE FI LED AN APPLICATION TO OPT VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 DA TED 27.12.2020 AND THE APPROVAL FROM CIT(A) IS AWAITED FOR. IN THIS CONNECTION, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT AS INSTRUC TED BY THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CLIENT, IT IS HEREBY PRAYED THAT THE ABOV E APPEAL PLEASE BE TREATED AS WITHDRAW WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT IN AS MUCH AS THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR SETTLEMENT UNDER THE VIVAD S E VISHWAS SCHEME-2020. A FORMAL ORDER, TO THIS EFFECT MAY KIN DLY BE PASSED AT AN EARLY DATE AND OBLIGE. THANKING YOU. YOURS FAITHFULLY, FOR MAHENDRA GARIEYA & ASSOCIATES. 4. THE LD. DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDE R VIVAD SE ITA NO. 75/JP/2017 SHRI PURANMAL SAINI VS. ITO 3 VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSE D AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DI SMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 05/05/2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 05/05/2021. * SANTOSH. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI PURANMAL SAINI, ALWAR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-1(4), ALWAR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 75/JP/2017} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR