IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B, BENC H KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM ./ITA NO.752/KOL/2019 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2015-16) M/S SHINING EMOTIONAL SURPLUS PVT. LTD. C/O, SOUMITRA CHOWDHURY, ADVOCATE, 1A, RAJA SUBODH MULLICK SQUARE, KOLKATA-700013 VS. ITO, WARD-12(1), KOLKATA ./ ./PAN/GIR NO.: AAJCS 1657 H (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI SOUMITRA CHOUDHURY, ADVOCA TE & SHRI JOYDEEP CHAKRABORTY, ADVOCATE. RESPONDENT BY : SMT. RANU BISWAS, ADDL. CIT / DATE OF HEARING : 31/10/2019 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13/11/2019 / O R D E R PER BENCH: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE , PE RTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16, IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY TH E COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-24, KOLKATA IN APPEAL NO. 283/CIT(A)-24/KO L, WHICH IN TURN ARISES OUT OF AN ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER U/S 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT) DATED 20/12/2017. 2. AT THE OUTSET ITSELF, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE AS SESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT REPRESENT HIS CASE BEFORE LD. CIT(A) AS T HE NOTICE WAS NOT SERVED TO THE ASSESSEE DURING THE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS AND THE O RDER BEING AN EX-PARTE ORDER, STOOD VITIATED ON ACCOUNT OF VIOLATION OF PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE. THE LD. M/S SHINING EMOTIONAL SURPLUS PVT. LTD.. ITA NO.752/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2015-16 P PP PA AA AG GG GE EE E | || | 2 22 2 COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE CONTENDED THAT IN THE INTE REST OF JUSTICE, ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO CONTEST THE APPEAL BEFORE THE LD. FI RST APPELLATE AUTHORITY MAY BE GRANTED TO THE ASSESSEE. 3. WE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND CAREFULLY GONE THR OUGH THE SUBMISSION PUT FORTH ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ALONG WITH THE DOCUMENTS FURNISHED AND THE CASE LAWS RELIED UPON, AND PERUSED THE FACT OF THE CASE INCLU DING THE FINDINGS OF THE LD CIT(A) AND OTHER MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. WE N OTE THAT NOTICE OF HEARING DID NOT SERVE ON THE ASSESSEE AND THE LD. CIT(A) DID NO T CONSIDER THE ASSESSMENT RECORDS WHILE ADJUDICATING THE ISSUE. WE ALSO NOT E THAT THE LD. CIT(A) DID NOT DISCUSS THE ASSESSEES CASE ON MERITS BASED ON THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE BEFORE HIM HENCE IT IS A VIOLATION OF PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUS TICE. WE NOTE THAT IT IS SETTLED LAW THAT PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND FAIR PLAY RE QUIRE THAT THE EFFECTED PARTY IS GRANTED SUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD TO CO NTEST HIS CASE. THEREFORE, WITHOUT DELVING MUCH DEEPER INTO THE MERITS OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, WE RESTORE THE MATTER BACK TO THE FILE OF LD. CIT(A ) FOR DE NOVO ADJUDICATION AND PASS A SPEAKING ORDER AFTER AFFORDING SUFFICIENT OP PORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD TO THE ASSESSEE, WHO IN TURN, IS ALSO DIRECTED TO CONTEST HIS STAND FORTHWITH. THEREFORE, WE DEEM IT FIT AND PROPER TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF TH E LD. CIT(A) AND REMIT THE MATTER BACK TO THE FILE OF THE LD. CIT(A) TO ADJUDICATE TH E ISSUE AFRESH ON MERITS. FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALL OWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 13.11 .2019 SD/- ( S.S.GODARA ) SD/- (A.L.SAINI) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /KOLKATA; / DATE: 13/11/2019 ( SB, SR.PS ) COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. M/S SHINING EMOTIONAL SURPLUS PVT. LTD. 2. ITO, WARD-12(1), KOLKATA M/S SHINING EMOTIONAL SURPLUS PVT. LTD.. ITA NO.752/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2015-16 P PP PA AA AG GG GE EE E | || | 3 33 3 3. C.I.T(A)- 4. C.I.T.- KOLKATA. 5. CIT(DR), KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA. 6. GUARD FILE. TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSIST ANT REGISTRAR ITAT, KOLKA TA BENCHES