C. ANIL KUMAR, MUMBAI V. I.T.O. 19(3)-1, MUMBAI

ITA 7556/MUM/2011

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 120 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3614 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 5 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-04-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: C
• Next Hearing Date: 18-04-2013
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 09-11-2011
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES C MUMBAI . . , / BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER /AND . , SHRI D.KARUNAKAR RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . / ITA NO.7556/MUM/2011 ! ! ! ! ' ' ' ' / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06 C.ANIL KUMAR, 502, SUNRISE APTS., SAI ROAD, OPP. DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, PALI MARKET, BANDRA(W), MUMBAI 400 050. ! ! ! ! / VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER 19(3)-1 MUMBAI. # ./ $% ./ PAN/GIR NO. : ACWPC 0009K ( #& / APPELLANT ) .. ( '(#& / RESPONDENT ) #& ) / APPELLANT BY: NONE '(#& * ) / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI RAJARSHI DWIVEDY ! * + / DATE OF HEARING : 18/04/2013 ,-' * + / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 18/04/2013 . / O R D E R PER I.P.BANSAL, J.M: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LD. CIT(A)-30 MUMBAI DATED 05/08/2011 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005- 06. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS EARLIER FIXED FOR HEARING ON 17/ 1/2013, WHEN NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND MATTER WAS A DJOURNED TO 18/4/2013 . / ITA NO.7556/MUM/2011 ! ! ! ! ' ' ' ' / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-06 2 WITH A DIRECTION TO ISSUE NOTICE, WHICH WAS ISSUED TO THE ASSESSEE THROUGH RPAD AT THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN FORM NO.36. HOWEVER, THE NOTICE HAS BEEN RECEIVED BACK WITH THE REMARK OF POSTAL AUTHORITIE S LEFT. NO ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION FOR HAS BEEN RECEIVED. IT IS THEREFORE, PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL AND FO LLOWING THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL REPORTED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPL AN INDIA (P) LTD.38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PR ADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT , 223 ITR 480 (M.P) THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMIN E. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. / +0 ! /+ * 1 /$ * $+ 23 4 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18/04/201 3 . * ,-' 1 5!0 18/04/2013 - * 6 4 SD/- SD/ - ( . / D.KARUNAKAR RAO ) ( . . / I.P. BANSAL ) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 5! DATED 18 /04/2013 . . . . * ** * '+78 '+78 '+78 '+78 98'+ 98'+ 98'+ 98'+ / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. #& / THE APPELLANT 2. '(#& / THE RESPONDENT. 3. : ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 4. : / CIT 5. 8;6 '+! , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 6 < / GUARD FILE. .! .! .! .! / BY ORDER, (8+ '+ //TRUE COPY// = == = / 2 2 2 2 $ $ $ $ (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI