ACIT, New Delhi V. Shri Sat Prakash Rana, New Delhi

ITA 76/DEL/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 117 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7903 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 3 month(s) 17 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 23-04-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: D
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 05-01-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: VIJAY KR JIWANI
• Keywords: Tax effect

Judgement Text

ITA NO. -76/DEL/2016 SHRI SAT PRAKASH RANA. PAGE 1 OF 3 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH: D: NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO:- 76/DEL/2016 ( ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011-12) REVENUE BY : SHRI VIJAY KR. JIWANI, SR. DR ASSESSEE BY : NONE ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM THIS APPEAL BY REVENUE IS FILED AGAINST THE ORDER O F LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-15, DELHI, [LD. CIT(A), FOR SHORT] DATED 26.10.2015 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12. (2) ADMITTEDLY, THE TAX EFFECT IN THE DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL IS LESS THAN RS.20 LAKHS. VIDE CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018 DATED 11.07.2018 ISSUED BY CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 44(1), DELHI, ROOM NO. 1908, E-2, CIVIC CENTRE, MINTO ROAD, NEW DELHI. VS. SHRI SAT PRAKASH RANA, 823, BIJWASAN, PALAM VIHAR MOD, NEW DELHI -110037. PAN NO: ADZPR3989H APPELLANT RESPONDENT ITA NO. -76/DEL/2016 SHRI SAT PRAKASH RANA. PAGE 2 OF 3 (CBDT) UNDER SECTION 268A OF THE I.T. ACT, IT HAS B EEN DIRECTED THAT DEPARTMENT SHALL NOT FILE APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL IN CASE WHERE T HE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MONETARY LIMIT OF RS.20 LAKHS. IT IS ALSO DIRECTED THAT THIS INSTRUCTION WILL APPLY RETROSPECTIVELY TO THE PENDING APPEALS AND APPEALS TO BE FILED HENCEFORTH IN THE TRIBUNAL. IT IS ALSO DIRECTED IN THIS CIRCULAR, THA T PENDING APPEALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED TAX EFFECT MAY BE WITHDRAWN/NOT PRESSED. LEARNED SR. DR , WHO APPEARED ON BEHALF OF REVENUE, DID NOT PRESS THE APPEAL IN VIEW OF THE AF ORESAID CIRCULAR OF CBDT. WE MAY ALSO NOTE THAT THIS APPEAL OF REVENUE WOULD NOT FAL L WITHIN THE EXCEPTIONS PROVIDED IN THE AFORESAID CIRCULAR. IN THE RESULT, THE DEPARTME NTAL APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE, IN VIEW OF AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR. THE APPEAL OF REVE NUE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN/NOT PRESSED BY THE LEARNED SR. DR. WE CLARIFY THAT REV ENUE WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO FILE A MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION SEEKING RECALL OF THIS OR DER FOR RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL, IF IT IS FOUND THAT THE APPEAL OF REVENUE IS NOT COVERED BY AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR. (3) IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISS ED, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 23 RD DAY OF APRIL, 2019. SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (ANADEE NATH MISSHRA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 23.04.2019 POOJA/- COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT ITA NO. -76/DEL/2016 SHRI SAT PRAKASH RANA. PAGE 3 OF 3 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI DATE OF DICTATION DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER DATE ON WHICH THE TYPED DRAFT IS PLACED BEFORE THE OTHER MEMBER DATE ON WHICH THE APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR. PS/PS DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER IS PLACED BEFORE THE DICTATING MEMBER FOR PRONOUNCEMENT DATE ON WHICH THE FAIR ORDER COMES BACK TO THE SR. PS/PS DATE ON WHICH THE FINAL ORDER IS UPLOADED ON THE WEBSITE OF ITAT DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE BENCH CLERK DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK THE DATE ON WHICH THE FILE GOES TO THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR FOR SIGNATURE ON THE ORDER DATE OF DISPATCH OF THE ORDER