, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM . . . . , . . . . , $ $ $ $ BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NO. 76/VIZ/2013 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10) ITO , WARD - 2( 1 ) , GUNTUR. VS. M/S. LAVANYA CABLE NET WORK, FLAT NO. 1, 3/1, BRODIPET, GUNTUR. [ PAN : AABFL 9720 B] ( & & & & / APPELLANT) ( '(& '(& '(& '(& / RESPONDENT ) & ) / ASSESSEE BY : SHRI G.V.N. HARI ADVOCATE . '(& ) / REVENUE BY : SHRI I. SIRISH KUMAR- DR ) - / DATE OF HEARING : 28/12/2015 ) - / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 2 8 /12/2015 / O R D E R PER G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAINST THE ORD ER OF THE CIT(A), GUNTUR DATED 06/08/2012 FOR THE A.Y. 2009-1 0. 2 . WHEN THIS APPEAL IS TAKEN UP FOR HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS SUBMITTED THAT THE TAX EFFECT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL IS BELOW RS. 10 LAC. AS PER THE LATEST CIRCULAR NO.21 /2015 OF CBDT DATED 2 ITA NO.76/VIZ/2013 10/12/2015, BEING RETROSPECTIVE IN NATURE, THE APPE AL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. THE LD. D.R. HAS NOT RAISED ANY OBJECTION. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE REVE NUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HENCE, THE SAME IS DISMISSED. 3 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28 TH DECEMBER, 2015. SD/- SD/- ( . ) ( . . . . ) ( (( ( V. DURGA RAO ) )) ) ( G. MANJUNATHA) / // / JUDICIAL MEMBER / // / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /VISAKHAPATNAM: 3 / DATED : 28/12/2015 VR/SPS ) ' 4 / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO :- 1. & / THE ASSESSEE M/S. LAVANYA CABLE NET WORK, FLAT N O. 1, 3/1, BRODIPET, GUNTUR. 2. '(& / THE REVENUE ITO, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR. 3. 5 / THE CIT, GUNTUR. 4. 5 ( ) / THE CIT (A), GUNTUR. 5. ' , , / DR, ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM 6 . . . . / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER // TRUE COPY // 9: ( SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ) , / // / ITAT, VISAKHAPATNAM