IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI A BENCH: NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING ) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI K.N.CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO-7617/DEL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2015-16 BALAR MARKETING PVT. LT D., 217, FUNCTIONAL INDUSTRIAL AREA, PATPARGANJ, DELHI-110092. PAN-AAACB0361N VS ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1), NEW DELHI. APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SH.M.BARNWAL, SR.DR DATE OF HEARING 12.03.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 12.03.2021 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2 015-16 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-12, DELHI DATED 27.08.2 019. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF VIRTUAL HEARING BEFORE US. THE ASSESSEE, VIDE ITS LETTER DATED 26.02.2021, RECEIVED TH ROUGH EMAIL, HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY HER AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE RELA TING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. 3. CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTIONED APPEA L IS CONSIGNED TO RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. ITA NO.-7617/DEL/2019 2 4. HOWEVER, THE AFORESAID IS SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT THAT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMENT YE AR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESTATED ACT, THE APPELLANT (I.E., THE ASSESSEE) SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTIO N OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION APPROPRIATE LY AS PER LAW. THE RESPONDENT (I.E., THE REVENUE) HAS NO OBJECTION WITH RE GARD TO THE AFORESAID CAVEAT. 5. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO REC ORD AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMISSED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTUAL HEA RING ON 12 TH MARCH, 2021. SD/- SD/- (K.N.CHARY) (G.S. PANNU ) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESID ENT * AMIT KUMAR * COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI