SHRI GOVIND CHITLANGIA, KISHANGARH V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, Kishangarh

ITA 768/JPR/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 126 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2195 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 10 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 22-01-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 12-10-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: POONUM RAI

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKWY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 768/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11 SHRI GOVIND CHITLANGIYA, S/O SHRI KUNJ BIHARI THITLANGIYA, 1523/15, DAYANAND COLONY, KOTADA ROAD, RAM NAGAR, A JMER . CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD 2, KISHANGARH. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ADWPC0522C VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. POONUM RAI (DCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 22/01/2018 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 22/01/2018 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER DATED 23.08.2017 OF LD. CIT(A), KISHANGARHH FOR THE ASSE SSMENT YEAR 2010- 11. 2. NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING. IT IS NOTED THAT NONE HAS A PPEARED EVEN ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING ON 20.12.2017 THOUGH AN APPLIC ATION FOR ITA NO. 768/JP/2017 SHRI GOVIND CHITLANGIA VS. ITO 2 ADJOURNMENT WAS FILED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. AC CORDING, THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED TO 22.01.2018 WITH THE DIRECTION TO ISSUE A NOTICE THROUGH RPAD. DESPITE THE ADJOURNMENT TAKEN BY THE ASSESSEE ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING AND A NOTICE SENT THROU GH RPAD NOBODY HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE, IN T HE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE WHEN NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY REQUEST OF ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN FI LED THEN IT IS APPARENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PER USING AND PROSECUTION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. 3. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD ., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P. HIGH C OURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [1997] 22 3 ITR 480, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ADMITTED AND IS DISMI SSED IN LIMINE FOR NON PROSECUTION AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 22.01.2018. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO FOT; IKY JKO (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (VIJAY PAL RAO) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 22.01.2018. * SANTOSH. ITA NO. 768/JP/2017 SHRI GOVIND CHITLANGIA VS. ITO 3 VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI GOVIND CHITLANGIYA, AJMER. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO WARD 2, KISHANGARH. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 768/JP/2017} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR