IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD A BENCH : HYDERABAD (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE) BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 776 /HYD./201 9 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 20 1 3 - 14 SRI HARI GOPAL REDDY PINNPU VS ITO, WARD 4 ( 5 ) HYDERABAD HYDERABAD [PAN: APOPP0606G ] (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE: SHRI T. CHAITANYA KUMAR , A DV. FOR REVENUE: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY, D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 0 6 /05/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 31 /05/2021 O R D E R PER L.P. SAHU, A.M. THIS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR AY 20 1 3 - 14 ARISES AGAINST THE CIT(A) - 1 , HYDERABADS ORDER DATED 05 .02.2019 INVOLVING PROCEEDINGS U/S 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX AC T, 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT). HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES. CASE FILE PERUSED. 2. AT THE OUTSET, WE ARE INFORMED DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING FROM THE ASSESSEES SIDE THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED FOR SETTLEMENT BENEFIT UNDER THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME - 2020 BY WAY OF FORM NO.1 & 2, AND ITA NO.776/HYD/19 VSVS HARI GOPAL REDDY PINNPU, HYD. 2 FORM - 3 HAS ALSO BEEN RECEIVED . HENCE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR ASSESSEE REQUESTED PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. 3. WE D ISMISS THIS APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN AND FURTHER MAKE IT CLEAR THAT IT SHALL BE OPEN FOR THE ASSESSEE TO FILE FOR REVIVAL OF THE CASE IF THE SETTLEMENT BENEFIT IS DENIED FOR TECHNICAL REASONS. 4. THIS ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRA WN IN ABOVE TERMS. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 31 /0 5 /2021. SD/ - SD/ - (P. MADHAVI DEVI ) ( L.P. SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 31 ST MAY, 2021 *GMV COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. SRI HARI GOPAL REDDY PINNPU, C/O SHRI T.CHAITANYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE, FLAT NO.102, GOWRI APARTMENTS, URDU LANE, HIMAYATHNAGAR, HYDERABAD 500 029, TELANGANA 2. ITO, WARD 4(5), HYDERABAD 3. A CIT, RANGE 4 , HYDERABAD. 4. CIT(A) - 1 , HYDERABAD 5. PR.CIT - 1, HYDERABAD. 6. D.R. ITAT HYDERABAD 7. GUARD FILE