IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES B : HYDERABAD (THROUGH VIRTUAL CONFERENCE) BEFORE SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT A NO . 782 /H/201 7 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 20 09 - 10 INCOME - TAX OFFICER, WARD 9(3), HYDERABAD. VS. VEEPANENI BAPINEEDU, HYDERABAD. PAN AAVPV 8989J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : SHRI ROHIT MUJUMDAR ASSESSEE BY : SHRI MOHD. AFZAL DATE OF HEARING: 10 /0 2 /2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 22 /0 2 /2021 O R D E R PER BENCH: TH IS REVENUE APPEAL FOR AY 20 09 - 10 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE C I T(A) - 1 , GUNTURS ORDER DATED , 08 / 04 / 201 9 PASSED IN CASE NO. 2588/ CIT(A) 1/GNT/2011 - 12 INVOLVING PROCEEDINGS U/S 1 43(3) RWS 15 3A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 ; IN SHORT THE ACT. I TA NO. 782 /HYD/1 7 V EEPANENI BAPINEEDU, HYD. : - 2 - : 2. AT THE OUTSET, WE ARE INFORMED DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING FROM THE REVENUE SIDE THAT THE ASSESSEE WANT ED TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT UNDER THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME - 2020 IN THIS CASE AND, THEREFORE, REQUESTED TO PERMIT TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. IN VIEW OF THE SPECIFIC REQUEST FROM THE REVENUE SIDE, W E THEREFORE ORDER THAT TH IS APPEAL BE TREATED AS DISMISSED AS WITH DRAWN WITH A RIDER THAT IT SHALL BE VERY MUCH OPEN FOR THE REVENUE TO FILE FOR REVIVAL OF TH IS CASE, IF THE SETTLEMENT BENEFIT UNDER THE SCHEME IS DENIED TO THE ASSESSEE FOR TECHNICAL REASONS. 3 . IN THE RESULT, REVENUE APPEAL IS DISMISSED IN ABOVE TERMS. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 22 ND FEBRUARY , 2021 . SD/ - SD/ - ( S.S. GODARA ) (LAXMI PRASAD SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER HYDE RABAD, DATED : 22 ND FEBRUARY , 20 2 1 . K V I TA NO. 782 /HYD/1 7 V EEPANENI BAPINEEDU, HYD. : - 3 - : C OPY TO : 1 INCOME - TAX OFFICER, WARD 9(3),R.NO. 246, 2 ND FLOOR, D BLOCK, IT TOWERS, AC GUARDS, HYDERABAD 500 004. 2 SRI VEE P ANENI BAAP INEEDU, D.NO. 2 - 52/5, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, CHAITANYAPURI, DILSUKHNAGAR, HYDERABAD. 3 C I T(A) 1 , GUNTUR 4 PR. CIT (CENTRAL), HYDERABAD 5 ITAT, DR, HYDERABAD. 6 GUARD FILE.