Late Kiran Bhaskarrao Sanap, Aurangabad V. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle -3, , Aurangabad

ITA 79/PUN/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 1921 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 10 month(s) 21 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-12-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 17-01-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: PRATIBHA K. SANAP LEGAL HEIR OF

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH A, PUNE VIRTUAL COURT BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 79/PUN/2019 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2015-16 SMT. PRATIBHA K. SANAP L/H. OF LATE KIRAN BHASKARRAO SANAP, A-2, N-4, CIDCO, AURANGABAD (M.S.), MAHARASHTRA 431 001 PAN : AUIPS4176M VS. ACIT, CIRCLE-3, AURANGABAD APPELLANT RESPONDENT / ORDER THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CIT(A)-2, AURANGABAD ON 14-11-2018 IN R ELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2015-16. 2. BEFORE US, LEGAL HEIR OF THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED A LETTER DATED NIL SEEKING WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. THE RELEVANT CONTENTS OF SU CH LETTER READS AS UNDER : IN RESPONSE TO THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME 2020 LA UNCHED BY THE GOVERNMENT, WE HAD APPLIED FOR THE SAME. WE HAVE A LSO PAID ALL THE TAXES AS REQUIRED UNDER THE SCHEME. WE HAVE RECEIV ED THE FORM 3 FROM THE PCIT ACCEPTING OUR APPLICATION AND ACKNOWL EDGING OUR PAYMENTS. WE ARE ENCLOSING THE SAME FOR YOUR KIND REFERENCE. HENCE, WE NEED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AS REQUIRED UNDER TH E SCHEME IN ORDER TO AVAIL THE SCHEME. THUS, WE REQUEST YOUR H ONOUR TO KINDLY CONSIDER THIS APPLICATION AND ALLOW US TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. ASSESSEE BY SMT. PRATIBHA K. SANAP (LEGAL HEIR OF ASSESSEE) REVENUE BY SHRI S.P. WALIMBE DATE OF HEARING 08-12-2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 08-12-2020 ITA NO.79/PUN/2019 SMT. PRATIBHA K. SANAP L/H. OF LATE KIRAN BHASKARRAO SANAP 2 3. THE LD. DR DID NOT RAISE ANY OBJECTION TO THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. AS SUCH, THE LEGAL HEIR OF THE ASSESSEE IS PERMITTED TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08 TH DECEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- (PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VIC E PRESIDENT PUNE; DATED : 08 TH DECEMBER, 2020 / COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1. / THE APPELLANT; 2. / THE RESPONDENT; 3. THE CIT(A)-2, AURANGABAD 4. 5. THE PR.CIT-2, AURANGABAD , , / DR A, ITAT, PUNE 6. / GUARD FILE / BY ORDER, // TRUE COPY // SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY , / ITAT, PUNE ITA NO.79/PUN/2019 SMT. PRATIBHA K. SANAP L/H. OF LATE KIRAN BHASKARRAO SANAP 3 DATE 1. DRAFT DICTATED ON 08-12-2020 SR.PS 2. DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR 08-12-2020 SR.PS 3. DRAFT PROPOSED & PLACED BEFORE THE SECOND MEMBER JM 4. DRAFT DISCUSSED/APPROVED BY SECOND MEMBER. JM 5. APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.PS/PS SR.PS 6. KEPT FOR PRONOUNCEMENT ON SR.PS 7. DATE OF UPLOADING ORDER SR.PS 8. FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK SR.PS 9. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK 10. DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE A.R. 11. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER. *