SHRI RAM MOHAN KHATORIA, JAIPUR, JAIPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2-1, JAIPUR

ITA 797/JPR/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6320 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 8 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-07-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 02-11-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: P P MEENA

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH HKKXPAN] YS[KK L NL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI BHAGCHAND, A M VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 797/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012-13 SHRI RAM MOHAN KHATORIA 208 BALA JI KA RASTA, GHAT GATE, BAZAAR, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD 2(1), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AGOPK 5253 D VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDEN T FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI P.P.MEENA (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 18/07/2018 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 18/07/2018 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M. THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER DATED 21.08.2017 OF LD. CIT(A), JAIPUR FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. 2. NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE WHEN THIS APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING. IT TRANSPIRES FROM THE RECO RD THAT ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING THE ASSESSEE TOOK ADJOURNMENT AND L D. AR HAS DULY NOTED DOWN THE DATE OF HEARING. DESPITE THE DATE OF HEARING DULY NOTED DOWN BY THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE, NONE HAS APPEAR ED ON BEHALF OF THE IT A NO.797/JP/2017 SHRI RAM MOHAN KHATORIA VS. ITO 2 ASSESSEE NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN F ILED. THUS, IT IS APPARENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PRO SECUTION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. 3. THEREFORE, IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE D ECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDI A (P) LTD., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P . HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [ 1997] 223 ITR 480, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ADMITTED AND IS D ISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR NON PROSECUTION AS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18/07/2018. SD/- SD/- HKKXPAN FOT; IKY JKO (BHAGCHAND) (VIJAY PAL RAO) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 18/07/2018. * SANTOSH. VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI RAM MOHAN KHATORIA, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD 2(1), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO. 797/JP/2017} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR