IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD B BENCH AHMADABAD BEFORE SHRI D.K.TYAGI , JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI T.R. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 803/AHD/2013 ASSESSMENT YEAR :2005-06 SURESH KANJIBHAI PETHANI, 145, SMAT NAGAR, L.H. ROAD, SURAT-395003 V/S . THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(4), SURAT. PAN NO. A KKPP9313R (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) BY APPELLANT NONE /BY RESPONDENT SHRI P. L. KUREEL, SR. D.R. /DATE OF HEARING 23.07.2013 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 06.09.2013 O R D E R PER : SHRI T.R.MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS ARISING OUT OF THE O RDER OF LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS)-V, SURAT, IN A PPEAL NO. CAS/V/309/11-12 DATED 22.01.2013. THE ASSESSMENT W AS FRAMED BY INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-9(4), SURAT, U/S.143(3) R.W.S. 14 7 OF THE I.T. ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT) FOR THE ASSE SSMENT YEAR 2005-06. 2. AT THE OUTSET, IT IS SEEN FROM THE RECORDS THAT CASE WAS ADJOURNED FOR 23.07.2013, HOWEVER, ON THE DATE OF HEARING I.E. 23 .07.2013 NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR FILED ANY ADJOURNMENT PETITION. THIS SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL. 3. IN VIEW OF THESE FACTS, IT IS CLEAR THAT THE ASS ESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF THIS APPEAL AND ACCORDINGLY, FOLLOWI NG THE DECISION OF THE ITA NO. 803/AHD/13 A.Y. 05-06 PAGE 2 MULTIPLAN (INDIA) (P) LTD., (38 ITD 320), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON- PROSECUTION. THIS ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 06.09.2013 SD/- SD/- ( D.K.TYAGI ) (T.R. MEENA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TRUE COPY S.K.SINHA ! ! ! ! '! '! '! '! / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. / APPELLANT 2. / RESPONDENT 3. '(' ) * / CONCERNED CIT 4. *- / CIT (A) 5. !./ ), ) , 12( / DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. /45 67 / GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , 8/ 1 ': ) , 12( ;