, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH BE NCH B, CHANDIGARH , ! . .., # $, %& BEFORE: SH. SANJAY GARG, JM & DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, AM ITA NO. 805/CHD/2018 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2015-16 THE DCIT C-1, RISHI NAGAR LUDHIANA, PUNJAB M/S RICO CASTING LTD. B-26, FOCAL POINT LUDHIANA, PUNJAB PAN NO: AABFA7186L APPELLANT RESPONDENT !' ASSESSEE BY : NONE #!' REVENUE BY : SHRI. MANJIT SINGH $ %! & DATE OF HEARING : 24/10/2018 '()*! & DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 29/11/2018 %'/ ORDER PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, A.M: THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE REVENUE AG AINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-1, LUDHIANA DT. 23/03/2018. 2. ACCORDING TO CIRCULAR NO. 03/2018 DATED 11/07/20 18, THE CBDT IN SUPERSESSION OF EARLIER INSTRUCTIONS HAS DIRECTED T HAT DEPARTMENTS APPEALS BEFORE ITAT SHALL NOT BE FILED IN CASES WHERE THE T AX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MONETARY LIMIT OF RS. 20 LACS. THE TAX WILL NOT IN CLUDE ANY INTEREST THEREON. IT IS FURTHER CLARIFIED THAT IF IN THE CASE OF AN ASSESSE E, DISPUTED ISSUES ARISE IN MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT YEAR, APPEAL CAN BE FILED IN RE SPECT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IN RESPECT OF DISPUTED ISSUES EXCEEDS THE MONETARY LIMIT SO SPECIFIED. 3. ADMITTEDLY, IN THE DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL, THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS. 20 LACS, THEREFORE, DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL IS NOT MAINTAI NABLE. THE LD. DR COULD NOT BRING TO OUR NOTICE ANY EXCEPTIONS MENTIONED IN THE SAID CIRCULAR. 2 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- SD/- . .., # $, (SANJAY GARG ) ( DR. B.R.R. KUM AR, AM) / JUDICIAL MEMBER %& / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AG DATE: 29/11/2018 (+! ,-.- COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. $ / CIT 4. $ / 01 THE CIT(A) 5. -2 45&456789 DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. 8:% GUARD FILE