Feno Plast Limited, Secunderabad V. ACIT, Circle -1(3), Hyderabad

ITA 81/HYD/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 120 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2967 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 3 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-05-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 1999-2000
• Appeal Filed On: 24-01-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A', HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 81/HYD/2012 A.Y. 1999-2000 ITA NO. 82/HYD/2012 A.Y. 2000-2001 ITA NO. 83/HYD/2012 A.Y. 2001-2002 ITA NO. 84/HYD/2012 A.Y. 2002-2003 ITA NO. 85/HYD/2012 A.Y. 2003-2004 ITA NO. 86/HYD/2012 A.Y. 2004-2005 M/S. FENO PLAST LTD. HYDERABAD PAN: AAACF3076C VS. THE ASST. CIT CIRCLE-1(3) HYDERABAD APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SMT. T.H. VIJAYA LAKSHMI DATE OF HEARING: 20.05.2013 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 20.05.2013 O R D E R PER CHANDRA POOJARI, AM: THE ABOVE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGA INST DIFFERENT ORDERS OF THE CIT(A)-II, HYDERABAD FOR TH E ASSESSMENT YEARS 1999-2000 TO 2004-2005. 2. THE ABOVE APPEALS CAME FOR HEARING TODAY ON 20.5.20 13. EARLIER, THESE APPEALS CAME FOR HEARING ON VARIOUS OCCASIONS. BY ONE REASON OR THE OTHER, THE ASSESSEE TOOK ADJOU RNMENTS. ON THE DATE OF LAST HEARING ON 7.2.2013, HEARING OF TH E CASES WAS ADJOURNED AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE ON THE REA SON THAT THE AR OF THE ASSESSEE HAS TO REPRESENT SOME CASES BEFO RE THE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT ON THE SAME DAY. HOWEVER , NONE APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE ON TODAY THE 20.5.2013 NO R ANY PETITION SEEKING ADJOURNMENT OF THE HEARING WAS SUB MITTED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. THIS TYPE OF ATTITUDE ON THE PART OF THE ITA NOS. 81-86/HYD/2012 M/S. FENO PLAST LTD. ==================== 2 ASSESSEE SHOWS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEALS. ACCORDINGLY, APPLYING THE RATIO LAID DOWN BY THE DELHI BENCH OF THIS TRIBUNAL IN THE CAS E OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD. (38 ITD 320), THE ABOVE APPEAL S ARE NOT ADMITTED AND DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE IS AT LIBERTY TO FILE A MISCE LLANEOUS APPLICATION SEEKING RECALL OF THIS ORDER, IF THERE IS SUFFICIENT CAUSE IN NOT APPEARING BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL ON THE SCHEDULED DATE OF HEARING, I.E., ON 20.05.2013. 4. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEES ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20 TH MAY, 2013. SD/- (ASHA VIJAYARAGHAVAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/- (CHANDRA POOJARI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED THE 20 TH MAY, 2013 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. M/S. FENO PLAST LTD., C/O. M/S. M. ANANDAM & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, 7A, SURYA TOWERS, S.P. ROAD, SECUNDERABAD-500 003. 2. THE ASST. CIT, CIRCLE-1(3), HYDERABAD. 3. THE CIT(A)-II, HYDERABAD. 4. THE CIT-I, HYDERABAD. 5. THE DR A BENCH, ITAT, HYDERABAD. TPRAO