Shri Ganeshji Meghaji Rajput., B.K V. ITO, Ward-3, Patan

ITA 818/AHD/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 112 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3097 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 7 month(s) 15 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-11-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 18-11-2019
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 04-04-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: N K GOYAL
• Keywords: Reasonable cause
• Section: 143(3); 201

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD SMC BENCH BEFORE: SHR I AMARJIT SINGH , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS. MADHUMITA ROY , JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI GANESHJI MEGHAJI RAJPUT, BHARDAVA, WAV, DIST B.K. PAN: AJHPR9187R (APPELLANT) VS THE IT O , WARD - 3 , PALANPUR (RESPONDENT) REVENUE BY : S H RI N.K. GOYAL , SR. D . R. ASSESS EE BY: NONE DATE OF HEARING : 18 - 11 - 2 019 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 20 - 11 - 2 019 / ORDER P ER : AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER : - THIS ASSESSEE S APPEAL F OR A.Y. 2014 - 15 , ARI SES FROM ORDER OF THE CIT(A) - 4, AHMEDABAD DATED 14 - 09 - 2 017 , IN PROCEEDINGS UNDER SECTION 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961; IN SHORT THE ACT . 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF T HE APPELLANT - ASSESSEE. LAST OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING WAS G IVEN TO THE ASSESSEE FIXING THE DATE OF HEARING ON 18/11/2019 . DESPITE THIS, THE ASSE SSEE REMAINED UNREPRESENTED. IN THE AFOREMENTIONED PECULIAR FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY I T A NO . 818 / A HD/20 18 A SSESSMENT YEAR 2014 - 15 I.T.A NO. 818 /AHD/20 18 A.Y. 2014 - 15 PAGE NO SHRI GANESHJI MEGHAJI RAJPUT VS. IT O 2 REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE OR PETIT ION SEEKING TIME, IT CAN BE SAFELY PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT SERIOUS IN PURSUING THE APPEAL FILED. ACCORDINGLY THE ONLY ALTERNATIVE LEFT IS TO DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE. SUPPORT IS DRAWN FROM THE ORDER OF THE TRIBUNALS IN COMMISS IONER OF INCOME TAX VS. MULTI PLAN INDIA (P) LTD.; 38 ITD 320 (DEL) AND ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKA VS. CWT: 223 ITR480 (M.P.). 3. BEFORE PARTING, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO ADD THAT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS ABLE TO SHOW THAT THERE WAS A REASONABLE CAUSE FOR NON - REPRESENTATION ON THE DATE OF HEARING, IT WOULD BE AT LIBERTY IF SO ADVISED TO PRAY FOR A RECALL OF THIS ORDER. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPE AL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PR ONOUNCED IN THE OPEN C OURT ON 20 - 11 - 201 9 SD/ - SD/ - ( MADHUMITA ROY ) ( AMARJIT SINGH ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD : DATED 20 /11 /2019 / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: - 1. ASSESSEE 2. REVENUE 3. CONCERNED CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER/ , / ,