IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `F : NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI U.B.S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A.N. PAHUJA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.818/DEL./2009 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05) NEW VIDEO PVT. LTD., VS. DCIT, CIRCLE 13(1), SNR & COMPANY, (CAS.), NEW DELHI A-15, SECOND FLOOR, HAUZ KHAS, NEW DELHI.110 014. (PAN/GIR NO.AAACN0155G) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE REVENUE BY : SMT. ANUSHA KHURANA, SR.DR ORDER PER U.B.S. BEDI, J.M. THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE EMANATES FROM THE ORDER OF THE CIT (A)-XVI, NEW DELHI DATED 17.12.2008, RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05. 2. DESPITE SENDING NOTICE OF HEARING SUFFICIENTLY I N ADVANCE, ASSESSEE DID NOT APPEAR NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN RECEIV ED AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL, IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT EARLIER ALSO ON S EVERAL DATES THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED DUE TO VARIOUS REASONS INCLUDING AT THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE ITSELF. THUS, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF THE PRESENT APPEAL. 3. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES, 1963 AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. M ULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND THE JUDGMENT OF HONBLE MADHYA P RADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 I.T.R. 480 (MP), WE TREAT THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME. 2 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT SOON AFTER THE CONC LUSION OF THE HEARING ON 12.01.2012. SD/- SD/- (A.N. PAHUJA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (U.B.S. BEDI ) JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED : JANUARY 12, 2012 SKB COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A)-XVI, NEW DELHI. 5. CIT(ITAT) DEPUTY REGISTRAR, ITAT