M/s.Porkulam Service Co-op Bank Ltd, Thrissur V. The ITO, Guruvayoour

ITA 82/COCH/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 111 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3560 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 04-03-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 04-02-2020
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SUDHANSHU SHEKHAR JHA
• Assessee Lawyers: VIPIN K K
• Keywords: Competent authority
• Section: 80(P); 80P; 250; 113; 54; 154

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, AM & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JM ITA N O . 81 /COC H/20 20 : ASST.YEAR 2009 - 2010 ITA N O . 82/COC H/20 20 : ASST.YEAR 2010 - 2011 M/S. PORKULAM SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED C/O. M/S.CHEERAN VARGHESE & CO CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, CHEERANS, MUNDUPALAM, 1 ST CROSS, THRISSUR 680 001. [ PAN : AAAAP4486A VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 2 GURUVAYOOR. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SRI.VIPIN K.K. RESPONDENT BY : SRI. SUDHANSHU SHEKHAR JHA DATE OF HEARING : 0 4 .03.2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 04 .03.2020 O R D E R PER GEORGE GEORGE K, JM : THESE APPEALS AT THE INSTANCE OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE COMMON ORDER OF THE CIT(A) , DATED 15.11.2019 PASSED U/S. 154 R.W.S. 250 OF THE I.T.ACT. THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEAR S ARE 2009 - 2010 AND 2010 - 2011 . 2. THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE AS FOLLOW: THE ASSESSEE IS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR S UNDER CONSIDERATION , THE RETURN S OF INCOME WERE FILED AFTER CLAIMING DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. THE ASSESSING OFFICER PASSED ORDER S , DISALLOWING THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. THE REASONING OF THE ASSES SING OFFICER TO DISALLOW THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S ITA NO S . 81 - 82 /COCH/20 20 M/S. PORKULAM SCB LTD. 2 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT WAS THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS DOING THE BUSINESS OF BANKING, AND THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF INSERTION OF SECTION 80P(4) OF THE I.T.ACT WITH EFFECT FROM 01.04.2007, THE ASSESSEE WILL NOT BE EN TITLED TO THE DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT. 3. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER S OF ASSESSMENT DENYING THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT, THE ASSESSEE PREFERRED APPEAL S TO THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY. THE CIT(A) ALLOWED THE APPEAL S BY HOLDING THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. THE INTEREST INCOME RECEIVED FROM OTHER BANKS AND TREASURY ALSO WAS ALLOWED AS DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE I.T.ACT. IN ALLOWING THE APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE, THE CIT(A) F OLLOWED THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [(2016) 384 ITR 490 (KER.). 4. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE CIT(A) ISSUED NOTICE U/S 154 OF THE I.T.ACT PROPOSING TO RECTIFY HI S ORDER S PASSED, IN VIEW OF THE SUBSEQUENT JUDGMENT OF THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [ITA NO.97/2016 ORDER DATED 19 TH MARCH, 2019]. THE ASSESSEE OBJECTED TO THE ISS UANCE OF NOTICE. HOWEVER, THE CIT(A) REJECTED THE OBJECTIONS RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE AND PASSED ORDER S U/S 154 OF THE I.T.ACT, DISALLOWING THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT. ITA NO S . 81 - 82 /COCH/20 20 M/S. PORKULAM SCB LTD. 3 5. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER S OF THE CIT(A), THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THESE APPEALS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL RAISING THE FOLLOWING COMMON GROUNDS: - 1) RECTIFICATION MADE BY CI T (APPEALS) THRISSUR IS NOT IN ORDER AND IS MADE ON A DEBATABLE POINT. THE DECISION OF MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPER A TIVE BANK RENDERED BY HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA ON THE APPLICABILITY OF 80(P) TO A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY IS NOT FINAL AND SLP AGAINST THE DECISION HAS BEEN ADMITTED BY HON'BLE SUPRME COURT. FURTHER, ALLOWABILITY OF DEDUCTION U/S 80(P) TO A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY, WHICH IS NOT RECOGNISED AS A BANK BY RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, IS PENDING WITH HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AGAINST THE DECISION OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY IN THE CASE OF QUEPEM URBAN CO - OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY (2015) 58 TAXMANN.COM 113 (BOM BAY) WHICH IS HELD IN FAVOUR OF ASSESSEE. 2) RECTIFICATION U/ S 154 CANNOT BE MADE ON A DEBATABLE ISSUE WHICH IS STILL NOT CONCLUDED BY THE APEX COURT. 3) THE EXCLUSION GIVEN 80 (P)(4) IS LIMITED TO A CO - OPERATIVE BANK AND NOT TO A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY AND ASSESSEE IS NOT A CO - OPERATIVE BANK. 4) AS DECIDED BY HON'BLE HIGH COURT IN CASE OF CHIRAKKAL CO - OPERATIVE BANK, P RI MARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES REGISTERED AS SUCH UNDER KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, IS ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION U/ S 80(P). 5) THE ASSESS E E CRAVES LEAVE TO ADD/ALTER ANY OF THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL BEFORE OR AT THE TIME OF HEARING. 6. THE LEARNED AR RELIED ON THE GROUNDS RAISED. ITA NO S . 81 - 82 /COCH/20 20 M/S. PORKULAM SCB LTD. 4 6.1 THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, ON THE OTHER HAND, STRONGLY SUPPORTED THE ORDERS OF THE INCOME - TAX AUTHORITIES. 7. WE HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. T HE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF KIL KOTAGIRI TEA & COFFEE ESTATES CO. LTD. V. ITAT REPORTED IN 174 ITR 579 HAD HELD THAT WHEN AN AUTHORITY HAS DECIDED ON THE BASIS OF A DECISION OF THE HIGH COURT WHICH IS SUBSEQUENTLY REVERSED, THERE WOULD BE A RECTIFIABLE MISTAKE COMING WITHIN THE SECTION 1 54 OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT. THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT HAS REVERSED THE DICTUM LAID DOWN BY THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. (SUPRA) BY HOLDING THAT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE HAS TO BE EXAMINED TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE ASSESSEE IS CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY OR COOPERATIVE BANK. IN THE LIGHT OF THE LARGER BENCH JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT, THE EARLIER CIT(A) ORDERS GRANTING DEDUCTION U/S. 80P(2) OF THE I.T . ACT HAVE BEEN RIGHTLY RECALLED BY THE CIT(A). THEREFORE THE GROUNDS RAISED BY THE ASSESSEE THAT THE CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN PASSING ORDER U/S. 154 OF THE I.T. ACT ARE DISMISSED 7.1 THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [(2016) 384 ITR 490 (KER.)] HAD HELD THAT WHEN A CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN ISSUED TO AN ASSESSEE BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES CHARACTERIZING IT AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY, NECESSARILY, THE DEDUCT ION U/S 80P(2) OF THE ITA NO S . 81 - 82 /COCH/20 20 M/S. PORKULAM SCB LTD. 5 I.T.ACT HAS TO BE GRANTED TO THE ASSESSEE. HOWEVER, THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) HAD REVERSED THE ABOVE FINDINGS OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH C OURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) . THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) HELD THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CON DUCT AN INQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY TO DETERMINE THE ELIGIBILITY OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. IT WAS HELD BY THE HONBLE HIGH COURT THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER IS NOT BOUND BY THE REGISTRATION CERT IFICATE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY CLASSIFYING THE ASSESSEE - SOCIETY AS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. THE HONBLE HIGH COURT HELD THAT EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR IS SEPARATE AND ELIGIBILITY SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR EACH OF THE ASSESSMENT YEARS. THE FINDING OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT READS AS FOLLOWS: - 33. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1] IT CANNOT BE CONTENDED THAT, WHILE CONSIDERING THE CLAI M MADE BY AN ASSESSEE SOCIETY FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO EXTEND THE BENEFITS AVAILABLE, MERELY LOOKING AT THE CLASS OF THE SOCIETY AS PER THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION ISSUED UNDER THE CENTRAL OR STATE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT AND THE RULES MADE THEREUNDER. ON SUCH A CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE AC TIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIGHT OF THE PROVISIONS UNDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P. ITA NO S . 81 - 82 /COCH/20 20 M/S. PORKULAM SCB LTD. 6 33. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH HELD THAT THE APPELLANT SOCIETIES H AVING BEEN CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KCS ACT, IT HAS NECESSARILY TO BE HELD THAT THE PRINCIPAL OBJECT OF SUCH SOCIETIES IS TO UNDERTAKE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE LOANS AND A DVANCES FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES, THE RATE OF INTEREST ON SUCH LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BE AT THE RATE TO BE FIXED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNDER THE KCS ACT AND HAVING ITS AREA OF OPERATION CONFINED TO A VILLAGE, PANCHAYAT OR A MUNICIPALIT Y AND AS SUCH, THEY ARE ENTITLED FOR THE BENEFIT OF SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT TO EASE THEMSELVES OUT FROM THE COVERAGE OF SECTION 80P AND THAT, THE AUTHORITIES UNDER THE IT ACT CANNOT PROBE INTO ANY ISSUES OR SUCH MATTERS RELATING TO SUC H SOCIETIES AND THAT, PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES REGISTERED AS SUCH UNDER THE KCS ACT AND CLASSIFIED SO, UNDER THE ACT, INCLUDING THE APPELLANTS ARE ENTITLED TO SUCH EXEMPTION. 34. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH EXPRESSED A DIVE RGENT OPINION, WITHOUT NOTICING THE LAW LAID DOWN IN ANTONY PATTUKULANGARA [2012 (3) KHC 726] AND PERINTHALMANNA [363 ITR 268]. MOREOVER, THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BENCH IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] IS NOT GOOD LAW, SINCE, IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOW N BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1], ON A CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, BY REASON OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE AC TIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIGHT OF THE PROVISIONS UNDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SO CIETY [397 ITR 1] THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BENCH PERINTHALMANNA [363 ITR 268] HAS TO BE AFFIRMED AND WE DO SO. 35. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN ACE MULTI AXES SYSTEMS CASE (SUPRA), SINCE EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR IS A SEPARATE U NIT, THE INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE IS IN NO MANNER DEFEATED BY NOT ALLOWING DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, BY REASON OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, IF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY CEASES TO BE THE SPECIFIED CLASS OF SOCIETIES FOR WHICH THE DEDUCTION IS PROVIDED, EVEN IF IT WAS ELIGIBLE IN THE INITIAL YEARS. 7.2 THE CIT(A) HAD INITIALLY ALLOWED THE APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE AND GRANTED DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT. ITA NO S . 81 - 82 /COCH/20 20 M/S. PORKULAM SCB LTD. 7 SUBSEQUENTLY, THE CIT(A) PASSED ORDER S U/S 154 OF THE I.T.ACT, WHEREIN THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT WAS DENIED, BY RELYING ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA). THE CIT(A) OUGHT NOT TO HAVE REJECTED THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT WITHOUT EXAMINING THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE - SOCIETY. THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) HAD HELD THAT THE A.O. HAS TO CONDUCT AN INQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY TO DETERMINE THE ELIGIBILITY OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. IN VIEW OF THE DICTUM LAID DOWN BY THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT (SUPRA), WE RESTORE THE ISSUE OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) TO THE FILES OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER. THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL EXAMINE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE ACTIVITIES ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVITIES OF A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FUNCTIONING UNDER THE KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969 AND ACCORDINGLY GRANT DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT. 7.3 AS REGARDS THE INTEREST ON THE INVESTMENTS WITH CO - OPERATIVE BANKS AND OTHER BANKS, THE CO - ORDINATE BENCH ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF KIZHATHADIYOOR SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED IN ITA NO.525/COCH/2014 (ORDER DATED 20.07.2016), HAD HELD THAT INTEREST INCOME EARNED FROM INVESTMENTS WITH TREASURIES AND BANKS IS PART OF BANKIN G ACTIVITY OF THE ASSESSEE, AND THEREFORE, THE SAID INTEREST INCOME WAS ELIGIBLE TO BE ASSESSED AS `INCOME FROM BUSINESS ITA NO S . 81 - 82 /COCH/20 20 M/S. PORKULAM SCB LTD. 8 INSTEAD OF `INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES. HOWEVER, AS REGARDS THE GRANT OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT ON SUCH INTEREST INCOME, THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL FOLLOW THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) AND EXAMINE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE - SOCIETY BEFORE GRANTING DED UCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT ON SUCH INTEREST INCOME. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 8. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL S FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 04 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2020 . SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) (GEORGE GEORGE K.) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER COCHIN , DATED 04 TH MARCH, 2020 DEVADAS G* COPY TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A), THRISSUR. 4. THE PR.CIT, THRISSUR. 5. THE DR, ITAT, KOCHI 6. GUARD FILE. ASST.REGISTRAR/ITAT/KOCHI