Roop Kishore Agarwal (HUF), Delhi V. ITO ward-46(2), New Delhi

ITA 8266/DEL/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 107 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0690 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 8 month(s) 17 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-07-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Assessment Year: 2016-2017
• Appeal Filed On: 16-10-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘F’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Saktijit Dey, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 8266/Del/2019 : Asstt. Year : 2016-17 Roop Kishore Agarwal (HUF), 4734, Balli Maran, Delhi-110006 Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-46(2), New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAEHR0720A Assessee by : Sh. Amit Arora, CA Revenue by : Ms. Indu Bala Saini, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 29.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 04.07.2022 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-16, New Delhi dated 19.08.2019. 2. At the outset, it was brought to the notice of bench by the ld. DR that the assessee has filed application under the “Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act 2020” and has already submitted Form 1 & 2 and Form 5 have been issued by the designated authority. 3. Keeping in view the exercise of option by the assessee to opt for the scheme, the appeal of the assessee is being dismissed as infructuous. ITA No.8266/Del/2019 Roop Kishore Agarwal (HUF) 2 4. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 04/07/2022. Sd/- Sd/- (Saktijit Dey) (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 04/07/2022 *Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR