, , , , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES J, MUMBAI .. , ! ' #$ %& , ' ' , ( BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, AM AND SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM ./ ITA NO.8274/MUM/2011 ( '* + '* + '* + '* + / / / / ASST YEAR : 2008-2009) SHRI JASWANTLAL J SHAH 60 BAPU KHOTE X LANE MUMBAI 400 003. PAN : AADPS2464H. THE DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 32 MUMBAI. ( ,- / // / APPELLANT) * * * * / VS. ( ./,-/ RESPONDENT) ,- 0 00 0 1 1 1 1 / APPELLANT BY : --- NONE --- ./,- 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI MOHIT JAIN * 0 $! / / / / DATE OF HEARING : 21.11.2012 23+ 0 $! / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 27.11.2012 '% '% '% '% / / / / O R D E R PER R.S.SYAL, AM : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE ARISES OUT OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS) ON 14.10.2011 IN RELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 21.11.2012. HOWEVER, DESPITE NOTICE, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSE SSEE NOR HAS HE MOVED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. IT IS, THERE FORE, PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, BY APPLYING THE RATIO LAID DOWN BY THE ITAT DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P.) LTD. [(1991) 38 ITD 320] , WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE APPELLANT-ASS ESSEE AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. ITA NO.8274/MUM/2011 JASWANTLAL J SHAH. 2 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 27 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2012. '% 0 23+ 4'*5 3 0 6 SD/- SD/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (R.S.SYAL) ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' / JUDICIAL MEMBER ! ' ! ' ! ' ! ' / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; 4'* DATED : 27 TH NOVEMBER, 2012. DEVDAS* '% 0 .'$#7 87+$ '% 0 .'$#7 87+$ '% 0 .'$#7 87+$ '% 0 .'$#7 87+$/ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. ,- / THE APPELLANT 2. ./,- / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 9 () / THE CIT(A)-36, MUMBAI. 4. 9 / CIT 5. 7<6 .'$'* , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 6= > / GUARD FILE. '%* '%* '%* '%* / BY ORDER, /7$ .'$ //TRUE COPY// ? ? ? ?/ // /@ @ @ @ ( DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , , , , / ITAT, MUMBAI