IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH B, HYDERABAD (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.828/HYD//2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2011 - 12 ESSEMM FINCAP LIMITED, HYDERABAD. PAN: AAACE 8018 K VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 17(2), HYDERABAD. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: NONE REVENUE BY: SHRI ROHIT MUJUMDAR, DR ITA NO. 118/HYD/2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010 - 11 SRI KADARU NARASIMHA REDDY, SURYAPET 508 213. PAN: ACTPK 0496 K VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, SURYAPET. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: SHRI M.V. ANIL KUMAR REVENUE BY: SHRI ROHIT MUJUMDAR, DR ITA NO. 680/HYD/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2011 - 12 TINGRIKAR ABHISHEK, HYDERABAD. PAN: AEPPT 8911 G VS. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 7, HYDERABAD. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: SHRI S. RAMA RAO REVENUE BY: SHRI ROHIT MUJUMDAR, DR 2 DATE OF HEARING: 01/02/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 02 /02/2021 ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY , A.M: ALL THE SE THREE APPEAL S ARE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE S, AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER S OF THE RESPECTIVE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), HYDERABAD . 2. ALL THE ABOVE MENTIONED ASSESSEES HAVE FILED WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS BEFORE US SEEKING WITHDRAWAL OF THEIR APPEALS AS THE Y HAVE OPTED TO AVAIL VIVAD SE VISWAS SCHEME. IT IS FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE S HAVE FILED FORM NO.1 & 2 IN ALL THESE CASES AND ALSO RECEIVED FORM - 3 FROM THE REVENUE IN CERTAIN CASES . HENCE, IT IS PRAYED IN THE WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS THAT THE APPEAL S OF THE RESPECTIVE ASSESSEE S MAY BE ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN AND DISMISSED AS SUCH. 3. THE LD. DR CONCEDED TO THE REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE S AND THEIR COUNSELS. 4. HAVING HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE, W E ARE INCLINED TO ALLO W THE APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE S TO BE WITHDRAWN YIELDING TO THE PRAYER OF THE LD. A RS AS THE ASSESSEES HAVE PREFERRED TO AVAIL THE VIVAD - SE - VISHWAS SCHEME BY FILING FORM NO.1, 2 IN ALL THE INSTANT CASES 3 AND IN SOME CASES THE ASSESSEES HAVE ALSO RECEIVED FORM NO - 3 FROM THE REVENUE. THE LD. DR HAS ALSO CONCEDED TO THE REQUEST OF THE LD. A RS. A CCORDINGLY, WE HEREBY DISMISS THE APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEES AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, WE ALSO MAKE IT CLEAR THAT, IF ANY OF THE ASSESSEE S CASE S ARE NOT ACCEPTED IN THE VIVAD - SE - VISWAS SCHEME BY THE REVENUE FOR WHATSOEVER MAY BE THE REASON, THEN THE RESP ECTIVE ASSESSEE S SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO FILE MISCELLANEOUS PETITION S BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL WITHIN THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED UNDER THE ACT TO REINSTATE THE IR APPEAL. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 5. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE ABOVE - MENTIONED APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSE E S ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN . PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE SECOND FEBRUARY , 2021. SD/ - SD/ - (SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI) ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED: 02 ND FEBRUARY , 2021. OKK COPY TO: - 1) (I) ESSEMM FINCAP LIMITED, PLOT NO. 22, NANDAGIRI HILLS, HUDA LAYOUT, ROAD NO.69, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD. (II) SRI KADARU NARASIMHA REDDY C/O. M. ANANDAM & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS, 7A, SURYA TOWERS, S.P. ROAD, SECUNDERABAD. (III) TINGRIKARABHISHEK, PROP. MANIK WINES, D.NO. 13 - 6 - 690/3, KARWAN, ZIAGUDA, HYDERABAD 500 006. 4 2) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 17(2), 9 TH FLOOR, SIGNATURE TOWERS, NEAR BOTANIAL GARDEN, KONDAPUR, HYDERABAD. (II) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1, SURYAPET. (III) JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE - 7, SIGNATURE TOWERS , KONDAPUR, HYDERABAD 500 0084. 3) THE CIT(A) - 5 , HYDERABAD . (II) THE CIT (A) - 3, HYDERABAD. (III) THE CIT (A) - 12, HYDERABAD. 4) THE PR. CIT - 5 , HYDERABAD. (II) PR. CIT - 3, HYDERABAD. (III) THE PR. CIT - 3, HYDERABAD. ` 5) THE DR, ITAT, HYDERABAD 6) GUARD FILE