NIRMALA T. ADNANI, MUMBAI V. ACIT CIR 14(3), MUMBAI

ITA 8283/MUM/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 71416 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 10 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 14-10-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Next Hearing Date: 14-10-2013
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 30-11-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'B' BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI D. MANMOHAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SANJAY ARORA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 8283 & ITA 8296/MUM/2010 (ASSESSMENT YEARS: 2006-07 & 2007-08) MRS. NIRMALA T. ADNANI ACIT, CIRCLE 14(3) 678, GOVIND CHOWK MUMBAI M.J. MARKET, MUMBAI 400002 VS. PAN - AAIPA0736F APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI MANVENDRA GOYAL DATE OF HEARING: 14.10.2013 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 14.10.2013 O R D E R PER D. MANMOHAN, V.P. THESE APPEALS ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDERS PASSE D BY THE CIT(A) 25, MUMBAI FOR ASSESSMENT YEARS 2006-07 AND 2007-08. 2. THOUGH NOTICE WAS SERVED UPON THE ASSESSEE (VIDE AC KNOWLEDGEMENT ON RECORD) WELL IN ADVANCE, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ON THE DATE FIXED FOR HEARING. WE ARE, THEREFORE, OF THE V IEW THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEALS. THEREFORE, IN T HE LIGHT OF THE DECISION OF THE HON'BLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF M/S. C HEMIPOL VS. UNION OF INDIA IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 62 OF 2009, WE D ISMISS THE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 14 TH OCTOBER, 2013. SD/- SD/- (SANJAY ARORA) (D. MANMOHAN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT MUMBAI, DATED: 14 TH OCTOBER, 2013 ITA NO. 8283 & 8296/MUM/2010 MRS. NIRMALA T. ADNANI 2 COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A) 25, MUMBAI 4. THE CIT IX, MUMBAI CITY 5. THE DR, B BENCH, ITAT, MUMBAI BY ORDER //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, MUMBAI BENCHES, MUMBAI N.P.