VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES B, JAIPUR JH LANHI XLKA ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA -@ ITA NO. 836/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'KZ@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11 SHRI MOOL CHAND SEWANI, S/O-SHRI GOPAL DAS SEWANI, FLAT NO. 202, PLOT NO E-40, MUHANA MANDI ROAD, DADU DAYAL NAGAR, MANSAROVAR, JAIPUR-302020. CUKE VS. I.T.O. WARD 6(1) JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA -@THVKBZVKJ LA -@ PAN/GIR NO.: AVXPS 2285 H VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS @ ASSESSEE BY : WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY: SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY(ADDL.CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 25/01/2021 MN?KKS 'K.KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28/01/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), AJMER DATED 12/03/2019 FOR THE A.Y. 2010-11. 2. THE HEARING OF THE APPEAL WAS CONCLUDED THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE IN VIEW OF THE PREVAILING SITUATION OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC. 3. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FURNISHED APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THIS APPEAL. THE CONTENTION IN THE SAID APPLICATION READS AS UNDER: ITA 836/JP/2019_ MOOL CHAND SEWANI VS ITO 2 IN THE ABOVE CONTEXT, IT IS SUBMITTED THAT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE APPELLANT FOR THE A.Y. 2010-11 ON 07/06/2019 ITA NO. 836/JP?2019 HAS ALREADY BEEN WITHDRAWN VIA EMAIL DATED 11/01/2021 AS THE APPELLANT OPTED VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME. THE APPELLANT HAS ALSO RECEIVED FORM-3 FROM THE PCIT-2, JAIPUR. CONSEQUENTLY FORM-4 HAS ALSO BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE PCIT-2, JAIPUR ON 15/01/2021. IN SUPPORT OF THIS, COPY OF FROM-4 IS ATTACHED. WITH REGARDS (C.P. CHAWLA (A/R) 4. THE LD DR HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO BE WITHDRAWN. 5. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY APPROACHED THE DEPARTMENT TO SETTLE THE MATTER UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSES IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 6. IN THE RESULT, THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28 TH JANUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XLKA (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:-28/01/2021 *RANJAN VKNS 'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI MOOL CHAND SEWANI, JAIPUR. ITA 836/JP/2019_ MOOL CHAND SEWANI VS ITO 3 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE I.T.O., WARD 6(1) JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 836/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR