IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.84/PUN/2022 नधा रण वष / Assessment Year : 2017-18 Mitesh Nitin Shah, Near Baroda Bank, Suryapushp, Ambedkar Road, Shirpur, Dhule 425 405, Maharashtra PAN : BBJPS4530E Vs. ITO, Ward-1, Dhule (Appellant) Respondent) आदेश / ORDER PER R.S.SYAL, VP : This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(Appeals) - National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’) on 06-09-2021 in relation to the assessment year 2017-18. 2. There is a delay of 87 days in filing this appeal before the Tribunal. The ld. AR stated that the delay in filing the appeal was caused due to Covid pandemic situation prevailing in the country at the material time. I am satisfied with the reason so stated. The Appellant by Shri Pramod Shingte Respondent by Shri S.P. Walimbe Date of hearing 30-03-2022 Date of pronouncement 30-03-2022 ITA No. 84/PUN/2022 Mitesh Nitin Shah 2 Hon’ble Supreme Court in Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re 438 ITR 296 (SC) read with judgment in Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re 432 ITR 206 (SC) dated 08-03-2021 and 421 ITR 314 has taken a suo motu cognizance of the situation arising out of the challenges faced by the country on account of COVID-19 Virus and resultant difficulties that could be faced by the litigants across the country and accordingly extended the time limit for filing of the appeals. I, therefore condone the delay in filing the instant appeal and admit the same for disposal on merits. 3. I have heard both the sides and gone through the relevant material on record. It is seen that the assessment order in this case was passed ex parte u/s.144 of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) also passed the ex parte in the absence of the assessee. The ld. AR submitted that the assessee was not given proper opportunity of presenting his case before the AO. It was, therefore, prayed that one more opportunity be accorded to the assessee to represent his case in a proper manner. The ld. AR undertook that the assessee will put in proper representation before the AO if the matter is restored. In view of the above factual background prevailing in the extant case, I am of the opinion that it would be just and fair if the impugned order is set-aside and the matter is remitted to the file of the AO ITA No. 84/PUN/2022 Mitesh Nitin Shah 3 with a direction to pass the assessment order afresh as per law after allowing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Needless to say, the assessee will be at liberty to lead any fresh evidence in support his point of view in the fresh assessment. I order accordingly. 4. In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 30 th March, 2022. Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) उपा य / VICE PRESIDENT प ु णे Pune; दनांक Dated : 30 th March, 2022 Satish आदेश क त ल प अ े षत / Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. यथ / The Respondent; 3. The CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi 4. 5. The Pr.CIT concerned वभागीय त न ध, आयकर अपील!य अ धकरण, प ु णे “SMC” / DR ‘SMC’, ITAT, Pune; 6. गाड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशान ु सार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune ITA No. 84/PUN/2022 Mitesh Nitin Shah 4 Date 1. Draft dictated on 30-03-2022 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 30-03-2022 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member -- JM 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. -- JM 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *