IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH H: NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI R.P. TOLANI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.851 /DEL/ 2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2003-2004) VIKAS UTILITIES PVT. LTD. VS. DCIT B-48, AMAN PURI ADHYAPAK NAGAR, C IRCLE 17(1) NANGLOI NEW DELHI NEW DELHI PAN NO. : AAACV5289N (APPELLANT ) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE. RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SAM EER SHARMA, SR. DR ORDER PER B.C. MEENA, AM : THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A), - 19, NEW DELHI DATED 29.11.2012 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2003- 04. 2. NONE PUT IN APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF T HE ASSESSEE WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING FOR 12.08.2013 NOR ANY REQUEST F OR ADJOURNMENT WAS FILED. THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS DULY INTIMATED BY ACKNOWLEDGE MENT CUM NOTICE FOR FILING THE APPEAL. THE DEFECTS IN THE APPEAL WERE ALSO INTIMAT ED BY DEFECT NOTICE WHICH HAS ITA NO.851/ DEL/ 2013 2 NOT BEEN REMOVED BY THE ASSESSEE TILL DATE. THIS GI VES AN IMPRESSION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED. WE, THEREFORE, HAVE NO OPTION BUT TO DISMISS THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE A SSESSEE, PLACING RELIANCE ON THE RATIO OF DECISIONS IN THE FOLLOWING CASES :- 1. CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PV T. LTD. 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND 2. LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT (1996) 223 ITR 480 (MP) 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL STAN DS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 12 AUGUST, 2013. SD/- SD/- (R.P.TOLANI) (B.C. MEENA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER BINITA RUKHAIYAR DATE: 12 AUGUST , 2013 COPY FORWARDED TO 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. CIT (ITAT), NEW DELHI