Shri Ankit Jain, Jaipur V. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range-7, Jaipur

ITA 855/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 119 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0907 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 month(s) 21 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-11-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 29-06-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: J C KULHARI

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA. NO. 855/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2012-13 SHRI ANKIT JAIN JAIN MOHALLA, JOBNER, TEHSIL- PHULERA, DISTT - JAIPUR CUKE VS. ACIT, RANGE-7, JAIPUR LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AGRPJ6323L VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RES PONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI J. C. KULHARI (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 14/11/2018 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 20/11/2018 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST TH E ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-3, JAIPUR DATED 24.01.2018 FOR THE ASSESSMEN T YEAR 2012-13. 2. NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS FILED. IT IS THUS APPA RENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING PROSECUTION OF THE PR ESENT APPEAL. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENCH OF ITAT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON ITA NO. 855/JP/2018 SHRI ANKIT JAIN, JAIPUR VS. ACIT, JAIPUR 2 THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [1997] 223 ITR 480, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. BEFORE PARTING, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO STATE THAT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS SERIOUS IN PURSUING ITS APPEAL FILED, THEN IT WO ULD BE AT LIBERTY IF SO ADVISED TO PRAY FOR A RECALL OF THIS ORDER BY MOVIN G AN APPROPRIATE APPLICATION AND BY GIVING AN UNDERTAKING THAT IT SH ALL NOT ABUSE THE TIME OF THE TRIBUNAL. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20/11/2018. SD/- SD/- FOT; IKY JKO FOE FLAG ;KNO (VIJAY PAL RAO) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 20/11/2018. *GANESH KR VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI ANKIT JAIN, JAIPUR 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ACIT, RANGE-07, JAIPUR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE { ITA NO. 855/JP/2018} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR