Shri Mohan Singh Shekhawat, 17, Rajputo Ka Mohalla, Rampura, Jaipur, Jaipur V. ITO Ward-7(4), Jaipur, Ward-7(4), Jaipur

ITA 862/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2019] 115 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5930 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 19 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-10-2019
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 12-06-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: RUNI PAUL

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YA DAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 862/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 SHRI MOHAN SINGH SHEKHAWAT 17, RAJPUTO KA MOHALLA VILL: RAMPURA, JJPR CUKE VS. THE ITO WARD- 7(4) JAIPUR LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AUUPS 4218 E VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE (NOTICE RETURNED) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. RUNI PAUL, (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 01/10/2019 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 01 /10/2019 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE ASSESSEE A GAINST THE ORDER OF CIT(A), ALWAWR DATED 26.02.2019 FOR THE ASSE SSMENT YEAR 2014-15 RAISING THEREIN VARIOUS GROUNDS OF APPEAL. 2.1 AT THE OUTSET OF THE HEARING, WE NOTICED THAT NO NE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. FURT HER FROM THE RECORDS, ITA NO. 862/JP/2019 SHRI MOAHN SINGH SHEKHAWAT VS ITO, WARD- 7(4), JAIPU R 2 IT IS NOTED THAT THE NOTICE WAS EFFECTED UPON THE AS SESSEE THROUGH REGISTERED POST ON THE ADDRESS SUPPLIED BY THE AS SESSEE IN FORM NO. 36. HOWEVER, THE NOTICE WAS RETURNED BACK BY THE POST AL AUTHORITIES WITH THE REMARKS INCOMPLETE ADDRESS. EVEN OTHERWI SE, WE ALSO NOTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAD ALWAYS REMAINED NON-COOPERATIV E TO REPRESENT HIS CASE BEFORE LOWER AUTHORITIES. 2.2 ON THE OTHER HAND, THE LD. DR PRESENT IN THE CO URT IS READY FOR ARGUMENT OF THE CASE. THEREFORE, TAKING INTO CONSIDE RATION THE ABOVE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WE PROCEED TO H EAR THE CASE OF THE ASSESSEE EX-PARTE. 2.3 AFTER CONSIDERING THE MATERIAL PLACED ON RECORD AS WELL AS THE ORDERS OF THE LOWER AUTHORITIES AND ALSO THE PLEADIN G OF THE LD. DR, WE FIND THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT SUPPORTED ITS CLAIM BY FURNISHING ANY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE ON THE DATE OF HEARING. THEREFO RE, IN THE PRESENT FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, WE FIND THAT T HE LD. CIT(A) HAS RIGHTLY DISMISSED THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE. THUS T HE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ITA NO. 862/JP/2019 SHRI MOAHN SINGH SHEKHAWAT VS ITO, WARD- 7(4), JAIPU R 3 3. THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED WITH NO ORDER AS TO COST. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 01/10/2019 . SD/- SD/- FOE FLAG ;KNO LANHI XKSLKBZ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) (SANDEEP GOSAIN) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 01 /10/2019. *MISHRA VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI MOHAN SINGH SHEKHAWAWT, JAIPUR 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT-THE ITO, WARD- 7(4), JAIPUR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE {ITA NO.862/JP/2019} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSTT. REGISTRAR