M/s Karnataka State Co-operative Federation Limited , Bangalore V. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1(2)(1), Bangalore

ITA 866/BANG/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3969 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 6 month(s) 11 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-11-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Partly Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 02-11-2020
• Assessment Year: 2015-2016
• Appeal Filed On: 23-04-2019
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SUMER SINGH
• Keywords: Charitable institution; Set aside
• Section: 13; 20

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES A BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOU NTANT MEMBER ITA NO S . 864 TO 866 /BANG/201 9 (ASSESSMENT YEAR S : 20 13 - 14 TO 2015 - 16 ) M/S. KARNATAKA STATE CO - OPERATIVE FEDERATION LIMITED, 23/3, CRESCENT ROAD, SHIVANANDA CIRCLE, BANGALORE - 560 001 .APPELLANT PAN AAAJK 0471H VS. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(2)(1), BANGALORE. RESPONDENT. ASSESSEE BY: SHRI S. RAMASUBRAMANYAM, C.A. REVENUE BY: SHRI SUMER SINGH, ADDL. CIT (D.R) DATE OF HEARING : 02.11 .20 20. DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03 .11. 20 20. O R D E R PER SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, A. M : TH ESE THREE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST DIFFERENT ORDER S OF C OMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) - 1, BANGALORE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR S 2013 - 14, 2014 - 15 & 2015 - 16. THE I SSUES IN THESE APPEALS ARE IDENTICAL AND COMMON, THEY ARE HEARD TOGETHER AND PASSED CONSOLIDATED ORDER FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE. 2 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 2. THE FIRST GROUND IN THESE APPEALS ARE WITH REGARD TO CONFIRMING THE ACTION OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER BY THE CIT (APPEALS) IN TREATING THE CONTRIBUTION RECEIVED TOWARDS CO - OPERATIVE EDUCATION FUND AS INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT BY MISUNDERSTANDING THE MEANING OF THE WORDS OBJECTS AND ACTIVITIES. 3. THE FACTS OF THE CASE ARE THAT THE ASSESSEE IS FEDERATION FOR AL CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES FORMED AND REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959. THE MEMBERS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE CO - OPERA T IVE SOCIETIES IN THE STATE OF KARNATAKA. ITS MAIN OBJECT IS TO IMPART EDUCATION AND TRAINING TO THE MEMBERS, POTENTIAL MEMBERS, DIRECTORS AND OFFICE BEARERS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND MEMBERS OF GENERAL PUBLIC. THE ASSESSING OFFICER WHILE COMPLETING THE ASSESSMENT TREATED THE CONTRIBUTION RECEIVED AT RS.11,39,69,05 2; RS.13,25,27,459 AND RS.16,57,07,934 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2013 - 14, 2014 - 15 & 2015 - 16 RESPECTIVELY TOWARDS CO - OPERATIVE EDUCATION FUND AS INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE MADE PLEA BEFORE THE CIT (APPEALS) THAT THE SAID AMOUNT WAS COLLECTED FRO M VARIOUS CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES TOWARDS EDUCATION AND TRAINING AS PER THE REQUIREMENT OF PROVISIONS OF KARNATAKA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959. THE UTILIZATION OF THE SAID AMOUNT IS DEFINED IN THE SAID PROVISIONS OF THE ACT AND PRIOR APPROVAL OF ADVI SORY BOARD CONSTITUTED FOR THE PURPOSE AS PRESCRIBED. THE ASSESSEE DOES NOT HAVE ANY RIGHT OR POWER OVER THE FUNDS AND IT IS REQUIRED TO SPEND 3 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 THE AMOUNT ONLY AS PROVIDED IN THE STATUTE. IT HAS TO BE UTILIZED AS DIRECTED BY THE ADVISORY BOARD FOR THE P URPOSE OF IMPARTING EDUCATI O N TO THE MEMBERS, DIRECTORS AND MEMBERS OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND GENERAL PUBLIC AND TRAINING TO THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES. THE ASSESSEE SHALL UTILIZE SUCH FUNDS FOR THE ACTIVITIES OF FEDERATION FOR THE PU RPOSE SPECIFIED. IT WAS COLLECTED BY THE ASSESSEE ONLY BECAUSE OF ITS STATUTORY REQUIREMENT AND THEREFORE AMOUNT COLLECTED FOR CO - OPERATIVE EDUCATION FUND WAS NOT CONSIDERED AS INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. HOWEVER, THIS ARGUMENT OF THE ASSESSEE WAS REJECTED B Y THE LOWER AUTHORITIES. AGGRIEVED BY THE ASSESSEE, THE ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE US. 4. THE LEARNED AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE SUBMITTED THAT AS PER THE SECTION 57(2A) OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, EVERY CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY SHALL CONTRIBUTE 2% OF THE KARNATAKA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT SPECIFIES THE MANNER IN WHICH THE EDUCATION FUND SHOULD BE APPLIED BY THE FEDERATION. HE DREW OUR ATTENTION TO THE SAID PROVISIONS OF THE ACT. HE ALSO DREW OUR ATTENTION THE RULE 20 OF THE KARNATAKA CO - OPERAT IVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 REGARDING HOW THE EDUCATION FUND SHOULD BE ADMINISTERED AND HOW THE FUND SHOULD BE UTILIZED. ACCORDING TO THE LEARNED AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE, THE ASSESSEE HAS NO CONTROL OVER THE FUND AND IT HAS TO BE UTILIZED AS PER THE ABOVE RULE AND IT SHOULD BE ONLY FOR SPECIFIED PURPOSE AND AS SUCH IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IT IS DIVERTED AT SOURCE BY OVER RIDING TITLE. HE RELIED ON JUDGEMENTS OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. SITALDAS 4 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 TIRATHDAS 41 ITR 367 AND JUDGMENT OF HO N'BLE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. KARNATAKA URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCE CORPORATION (KUIDFC) 284 ITR 582; CIT VS. KARNATAKA STATE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCES PROCESSING AND EXPORT CORPORATION LTD. 377 ITR 496; CIT VS. PANDAVAPU RA SAHAKARA SAKKARE KHARKANE LTD. 198 ITR 690. HE RELIED ON THE JUDGEMENT OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. BIJLI COTTON MILLS (P) LTD. 116 ITR 60. FURTHER HE SUBMITTED THAT IT CANNOT BE TREATED AS INCOME IN THE HANDS OF THE ASSESSEE AS IT IS RECEIVED BY THE AS WITH AN OBLIGATION TO SPEND AS PER SECTION 57A OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT. FOR THE PURPOSE, HE RELIED ON THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF EMIL WEBBER VS. CIT 200 ITR 483 (SC). 5. ON THE OTHER HAND, T HE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE FEDERATION FORMED FOR PROVIDING EDUCATION AND TRAINING TO THE EMPLOYEES OF THE MEMBERS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES. THEREFORE THE CONTRIBUTION RECEIVED FROM THE MEMBER CO - OPERATIVE SO CIETIES TO BE CONSIDERED AS INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE AS THE ASSESSEE HAS CLAIMED THE CORRESPONDING EXPENDITURE N THE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT. ACCORDING TO LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE THERE IS NO STRENGTH IN THE ARGUMENT OF THE LD. AR THAT THE AMOUNT HAS BEEN RECEIVED FOR SPECIFIED PURPOSE, IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS DIVERTED AT SOURCE BY OVER - RIDING TITLE. HE RELIED ON THE ORDERS OF THE LOWER AUTHORITIES. 5 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 6. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. THE ASSE SSEE IS A REGISTERED CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 U NDER SECTION 57(2A) OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, EVERY CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY SHA L L CONTRIBUTE 2% OF ITS NET PROFITS TO CO - OPERATIVE EDUCATION FUND TO BE ADMINISTERED BY THE AS SESSEE I.E. KARNATAKA STATE CO - OPERATIVE FEDERATI O N LTD. AS PER SECTION 57A OF THE KARNATAKA SOCIETIES ACT, 1959, THE SAID AMOUNT HAS TO BE EXPENDED IN SUCH MANNER AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED. WE REPRODUCE THE RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF SECTION 57(2A) AND 57A OF TH E KARNATAKA SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 AS UNDER : 6 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 AT THIS TIME, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO GO THROUGH THE RULE 20 OF THE KARNATAKA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RULES WHICH READ AS FOL LOWS : 7 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 8 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 9 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 6.1 AS RIGHTLY POINTED OUT BY THE LEARNED AUTHORISED REPRESENT ATIVE, THE ABOVE PROVISIONS SHOW THAT FEDERATION DOES NOT HAVE CONTROL OVER THE FUNDS AND IS REQUIRED TO SPEND THE AMOUNT ONLY AS PROVIDED IN THE STATUTE. S.57A MANDATES THAT THE CO - OPERATIVE FUND SHALL BE UTILIZED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROMOTION OF CO - OPERA TIVE MOVEMENT AND PROVIDING EDUCATION TO MEMBERS AND OTHERS. IT ALSO REQUIRES THAT THE AMOUNT CONTRIBUTED UNDER SECTION 57(2A) SHOULD BE CREDITED TO A FUND ACCOUNT AND THE FUND SHALL BE ADMINISTERED AS PRESCRIBED IN THE RULES. IT ALSO STATES THAT NO EXPE NDITURE CAN BE INCURRED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE ADVISORY BOARD. RULE 20(4) STATES THAT THE FEDERATION MUST MAINTAIN A SEPARATE ACCOUNT AND ALL INCOME BY WAY OF INTEREST OR OTHERWISE THAT ACCRUE FROM THE CONTRIBUTION TOWARDS EDUCATION FUND SHALL BE CRE DITED TO THIS FUND ACCOUNT. THIS MEANS THAT THE FEDERATION CANNOT 10 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 UTILIZE THE EDUCATION FUND (BOTH THE PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST) AS IF IT IS ITS OWN FUNDS. IT IS ALSO MANDATORY TO SPEND THE EDUCATION FUND ONLY TOWARDS THE PURPOSES MENTIONED IN RULE 20(6). UNDER RULE 20(6), THE FUNDS HAVE TO BE UTILIZED FOR EDUCATION OF MEMBERS, HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT, DEVELOPMENT OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, ACTIVITY BUILDING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, PROFESSIONALIZATION ETC. THE ABOVE PROVISION MAKES IT VERY CLEAR THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS STATUTORY LIABILITY TO UTILIZE THE EDUCATION FUND ONLY FOR SPECIFIED PURPOSE AND HENCE, IT IS DIVERTED AT SOURCE BY OVER - RIDING TITLE. FURTHER IT IS CLEAR FR O M THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENTS OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. SI TALDAS TIRATHDAS (SUPRA) WHEREIN IT WAS HELD AS UNDER : IN OUR OPINION, THE TRUE TEST IS WHETHER THE AMOUNT SOUGHT TO BE DEDUCTED, IN TRUTH, NEVER REACHED THE ASSESSEE AS HIS INCOME. OBLIGATIONS, NO DOUBT, THERE ARE IN EVERY CASE, BUT IT I THE NATURE OF THE OBLIGATION WHICH IS THE DECISIVE FACT. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN AMOUNT WHICH A PERSON IS OBLIGED TO APPLY OUT OF HIS INCOME AND AN AMOUNT WHICH BY THE NATURE OF THE OBLIGATION CANNOT BE SAID TO BE A PART OF THE INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. WHE REBY THE OBLIGATION INCOME IS DIVERTED BEFORE IT REACHES THE ASSESSEE, IT IS DEDUCTIBLE; BUT WHERE THE INCOME IS REQUIRED TO BE APPLIED TO DISCHARGE AN OBLIGATION AFTER SUCH INCOME REACHES THE ASSESSEE, THE SAME CONSEQUENCE, IN LAW, DOES NOT FOLLOW. 6. 2 FURTHER THE JURISDICTIONAL KARNATAKA HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. KARNATAKA URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND FINANCE CORPORATION (KUIDFC) (SUPRA) HELD THAT INTEREST ACCRUED ON DEPOSITS HELD IN THE NAME OF KUIDFC, IT HAS TO BE APPL IED ONLY FOR THE PURPOSE OF WELFARE OF THE NATION / STATE 11 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 AS PROVIDED IN THE GUIDELINES. IT WAS HELD THAT SUCH INTEREST NEVER REACHED KUIDFC AS INCOME AND IT WAS DIVERTED AT SOURCE. THEREFORE, THE INTEREST EARNED WAS NOT TAXABLE. FURTHER IN THE CASE O F CIT VS. KARNATAKA STATE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCES PROCESSING AND EXPORT CORPORATION LTD. 377 ITR 496 (KAR) HELD THAT THE INTEREST EARNED FROM BANK DEPOSITS MADE OUT OF GRANTS RECEIVED FOR THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT INCOME IN ANY SENSE OF THE TERM. SINCE THE GOV T. OF KARNATAKA SPECIFICALLY DIRECTED THAT THE INTEREST EARNED BY THE FIXED DEPOSIT GRANTS PENDING UTILISATION SHOULD BE TREATED AS ADDITIONAL GRANT OF THE SCHEME AND NOT TO BE TREATED AS INCOME OF THE COMPANY HELD THAT SUCH INTEREST IS NOT INCOME. SINC E THE AMOUNT RECEIVED CANNOT BE DIVERTED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE FOR WHICH IT WAS RECEIVED, IT CANNOT BE TREATED AS INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE SINCE IT WAS DIVERTED AT SOURCE. 6. 3 FURTHER THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. BIJLI COTTON MILLS (P ) LTD. 116 ITR 60 (SC) WHEREIN IT WAS HELD THAT THE AMOUNT COLLECTED FROM CUSTOMERS BY WAY OF DHARMADA WHICH WAS CHARGED IN INVOICE IS NOT INCOME AS IT CAME WITH AN OBLIGATION TO SPEND THE MONEY SO COLLECTED FOR CHARITABLE PURPOSES. 6.2 I N THE PRESE NT CASE, THE CONTRIBUTION RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE FROM CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES TOWARDS SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT DISCRETION TO SPEND THE AMOUNT AND UTILIZE ABOVE FUND IS DECIDED BY THE ADVISORY BOARD CONSISTS OF DIFFERENT PERSONS AS PER THE DIRECTION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA. THE DONATIONS RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE WERE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSE. THE DONATIONS WHCH 12 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 ARE FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES DO NOT BELONG TO THE ASSESSEE. SUCH DONATION DO NOT FORM ITS INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. THIS DONATION IS FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES WOULD ONLY MEAN THAT THE ASSESSEE, AS AGREED TO ACT AS A TRUSTEE FOR THIS AMOUNT RECEIVED FROM VARIOUS CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND IT CANNOT BE TREATED AS ASSESSEE'S NORMAL INCOME. IN THIS CASE, THE ASSESSEE IS ACTING AS AN INDEPE NDENT TRUSTEE FOR THAT DONATION RECEIVED FROM VARIOUS SOCIETIES AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 57A R.W.S. 5 7 (2A) OF KARNATAKA SOCIETIES ACT, 1959 AND IT CANNOT BE CONSIDERED FOR TAXING THE SAME. HOWEVER, WE OBSERVE THAT THE ASSESSEE SHOULD HAVE ACTUAL LY KEPT TH E SAID DONATION IN SEPARATE ACCOUNT AND ANY AMOUNT SPENT AGAINST THAT DONATION SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEBITED TO THE SEPARATE ACCOUNT WITHOUT BRINGING THE SAME INTO INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT. IN OTHER WORDS, THE INCOMING AND OUTGOING NEED NOT B E REFLECTED IN THE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT OF THE ASSESSEE AND THIS DONATION TO BE TAKEN OUT OF THE INCOME AND EXPENDITURE ACCOUNT. SIMILARLY, THE RELEVANT EXPENDITURE SPENT OUT OF THE DONATION GO OUT FROM THE EXPENSES SIDE IN THE INCOME AND E XPENDITURE ACCOUNT. THE EXPENSES EXPENDED OUT OF THIS DONATION WILL BE DEDUCTED FROM THE SAID DONATION BY NOT CHARGING THE SAME INTO INCOME & E XPENDITURE ACCOUNT. THEREFORE IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE ASSESSING OFFICER TO REDO THE ASSESSMENT ACCORDINGLY . BEING SO, IN OUR OPINION, THE SAID CONTRIBUTION IS RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE CANNOT BE TREATED AS INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE. THIS GROUND OF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS PARTLY ALLOWED. 13 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 7. THE NEXT GROUND IN ALL THE THREE APPEALS IS WITH REGARD TO DE NIAL OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 10(23C)(IIIAB) OF THE ACT THOUGH THE ASSESSEE SATISFYING THE TWIN CONDITIONS I.E. EXISTING SOLELY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES AND NOT FOR PROFIT AND SUBSTANTIALLY FINANCED BY THE GOVERNMENT. 8. AFTER CONSIDERING THE ISSU E, WE FOUND THAT THIS ISSUE IS COVERED BY THE DECISION OF TRIBUNAL IN ASSESSEE'S OWN CASE IN ITA NO.1159/BANG/2011 AND 381/BANG/2014 DT.25.05.2016 FOR THE A.YS 2006 - 07 & 2005 - 06 RESPECTIVELY AT PARAS 6 TO 10 AS FOLLOWS : 6. HAVING CAREFULLY EXAMINED TH E ORDERS OF AUTHORITIES IN LIGHT OF THE RIVAL SUBMISSIONS AND JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE APEX COURT IN THE CASE OF VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY V. ACIT (SUPRA), WE FIND THAT FOR CLAIMING EXEMPTION U/S. 10(23C)(IIIAB), THE ASSESSEE SHOULD BE EITHER UN IVERSITY OR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION EXISTING SOLELY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE AND NOT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROFIT AND WHICH IS WHOLLY OR SUBSTANTIALLY FINANCED BY THE GOVERNMENT. THEREFORE, BEFORE CLAIMING EXEMPTION U/S. 10(23C)(IIIAB), THE ASSESSEE IS REQUIRE D TO ESTABLISH THAT IT IS EITHER UNIVERSITY OR EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION EXISTING SOLELY FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE AND NOT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROFIT AND IT IS WHOLLY OR SUBSTANTIALLY FINANCED BY THE GOVERNMENT. THESE ASPECTS WERE EXAMINED BY THE AO IN HIS ORDE R AFTER RECORDING THE OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY. 7. UNDISPUTEDLY, THE ASSESSEE IS A STATE CO - OPERATIVE FEDERATION OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ITS MEMBERS ARE DISTRICT CO - OPERATIVE UNIONS, APEX FEDERAL CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY, CO - OPERATIVE SPINNING MI LLS, COOPERATIVE SUGAR FACTORIES, CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES WHOSE AREA OF OPERATION S MORE THAN DISTRICTS BUT EXTENDS UPTO STATE AND CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES REGISTERED UNDER MULTI STATE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND WHOSE HAD OFFICE IS LOCATED IN THE STATE OF KA RNATAKA. THE MAIN OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE TO FUNCTION AS THE ACCREDITED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE CO - OPERATIVE MOVEMENT IN KARNATAKA STATE WITH A VIEW TO FURTHER ITS PROGRESS AND TO SAFEGUARD ITS INTEREST AND ALSO TO IMPART TRAINING TO THE EMPLOYEES OF CO - OP. SOCIETIES, DEPT. OF CO - OPERATION AND DEPT. OF CO - OP. AUDIT, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA. FOR THE SAKE OF REFERENCE, WE EXTRACT THE OBJECTS OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AS UNDER: - (I) TO FUNCTION AS THE ACCREDITED REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COOPERATIVE MOVEMENT IN KARNA TAKA STATE WITH A VIEW TO FURTHER ITS PROGRESS AND TO SAFEGUARD ITS INTEREST IN SUCH A WAY THAT THE BENEFITS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE MOVEMENT SHALL BE OPEN TO ALL IRRESPECTIVE OF CASTE, CREED AND RELIGION; (II) TO PROPAGATE CO - OPERATIVE PRINCIPLES AND PRACTIC ES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ENSURING THEIR ADOPTION BY ALL COOPERATIVE ORGANIZATIONS THROUGHOUT THE STATE; (III) TO IMPART TRAINING TO THE EMPLOYEES OF CO - OP SOCIETIES, THE EMPLOYEES OF DEPT. OF CO - OPERATION AND THE EMPLOYEES OF DEPT. OF CO - OP AUDIT. TO IMPART EDUCATION AND TRAINING TO THE MEMBERS, THE POTENTIAL 14 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 MEMBERS, THE DIRECTORS AND THE OFFICE - BEARERS OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND THE MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC; (IV) TO ACT AS COORDINATING AGENCY ON ALL MATTERS PERTAINING TO COOPERATIVE EDUCATION AND FUNCT ION AS A BODY OF EXPERTS IN MATTERS RELATING TO EDUCATION; (V) TO SERVE AS THE EXPONENT OF CO - OPERATIVE OPINION AND FUNCTION AS A FOCUSING CENTRE OF NON - OFFICIAL OPINION ON VARIOUS SUBJECTS AFFECTING THE MOVEMENT AND FOR REPRESENTING IT IN PROPER FORUM A ND TO CARRY ON PROPAGANDA AND CREATE PUBLIC OPINION ON SUCH SUBJECTS; (VI) TO PROMOTE DIFFERENT TYPES OF COOPERATIVE ACTIVITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS OF COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT AND TO STRENGTHEN THE EXISTING SOCIETIES IN THE STATE BY PROVIDING ASSIST ANCE AND GUIDANCE TECHNICAL AND OTHERWISE. (VII) TO BRING ABOUT COORDINATION AMONG DIFFERENT TYPES OF COOPERATIVE ORGANIZATIONS IN THE STATE FOR THEIR MUTUAL BENEFIT; (VIII) TO COOPERATE WITH THE NATIONAL COOPERATIVE UNION OF INDIA AND IMPLEMENT TO THE E XTENT POSSIBLE THE POLICIES ADOPTED BY THE NATIONAL COOPERATIVE UNION OF INDIA AND THE INDIAN COOPERATIVE CONGRESS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE MOVEMENT; (IX) TO OPEN LIBRARIES & READING ROOMS, TO PUBLISH OR ARRANGE PUBLICATION, PURCHASE AND SALE OF PERIODI CALS, BOOKS AND PAMPHLETS ON LITERATURE, IN GENERAL, AND ON COOPERATION, RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ALLIED SUBJECTS IN PARTICULAR AND ARRANGE FOR THE PRODUCTION OF AUDIO - VISUAL AIDS INCLUDING FILMS, FILM - STRIPS AND DOCUMENTARIES ETC. ON CO - OPERATION AND ALLIED SUBJECTS AND TO MAINTAIN OR CAUSE TO BE MAINTAINED COOPERATIVE PUBLICITY VANS; (X) TO ARRANGE FOR THE EXHIBITION OF ARTICLES RELATING TO AGRICULTURE, COTTAGE INDUSTRIES, VILLAGE AND SMALL SCALE INDUSTRIES, MINOR FOREST PRODUCE AND PROCESSING UNITS BELONGI NG TO THE CO - OPERATIVE INSTITUTIONS; (XI) TO ESTABLISH CO - OPERATIVE TRAINING CENTRES, SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES FOR RUNNING PRESCRIBED COURSES OF TRAINING AND IMPARTING INSTRUCTIONS, HOLDING EXAMINATIONS, AWARDING DIPLOMA AND ISSUING CERTIFICATES; (XII) TO DE VELOP INTER - CO - OPERATIVE RELATIONSHIP AND HELP THE COORDINATED FUNCTIONING OF THE CO - OPERATIVE MOVEMENT IN VARIOUS SECTORS; (XIII) TO CONDUCT STATE LEVEL / NATIONAL LEVEL CO - OPERATIVE CONFERENCES, SEMINARS, MEETINGS, WORKSHOPS, EXHIBITIONS AND COMPETITIO NS IN ESSAY WRITING, DEBATES ETC. AMONG STUDENTS OF HIGH SCHOOLS, COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES; (XIV) TO ACQUIRE, PURCHASE, OWN OR DISPOSE OF THE IMMOVABLE PROPERTY BY WAY OF SALE, LEASE, EXCHANGE OR OTHERWISE FOR THE FURTHERANCE OF THE OBJECTS OF THE FEDERA TION WITH APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL BODY; (XV) TO PROMOTE STUDY AND RESEARCH ON PROBLEMS CONNECTED WITH RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN GENERAL AND COOPERATION IN PARTICULAR AND TO CONDUCT SOCIO - ECONOMIC SURVEYS OF RURAL AND URBAN AREAS AND TO TAKE UP CONSULTANCY WORK , VALUATION ETC., (XVI) TO ESTABLISH PRINTING PRESS FOR PRINTING OF BOOKS, JOURNALS, PERIODICALS AND NEWSPAPERS, INCLUDING TEXT BOOKS, MAGAZINES. OTHER BOOKS AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS OF COOPERATIVES; (XVII) TO RAISE FUNDS INCLUDING CORPUS FUND AND ADMINIST ER THE FUNDS SO RAISED ACCORDING TO THESE BYE - LAWS AND SUBSIDIARY RULES FRAMED BY THE BOARD FROM TIME TO TIME; 15 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 (XVIII) TO ADVISE THE GOVERNMENT ON MATTERS RELATING TO COOPERATIVE MOVEMENT FROM TIME TO TIME; (XIX) TO SUPERVISE AND INSPECT THE WORK OF THE DIST. CO - OP UNIONS AND REPRESENT THEIR INTEREST; (XX) TO ADVANCE INTEREST FREE LOAN AND SUBSIDY TO DISTRICT COOP. UNIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW BUILDINGS DEPENDING UPON THE FINANCIAL POSITION, THE BUDGET ALLOCATION AND THE CAPACITY TO PAY OF THE FEDERATI ON; (XXI) TO DISCHARGE SUCH FUNCTIONS AND SUCH DUTIES AS THE STATE GOVERNMENT/THE REGISTRAR OR THE NATIONAL CO - OPERATIVE UNION OF INDIA MIGHT VEST IN THE FEDERATION; (XXII) TO ARRANGE STUDY TOURS OUTSIDE THE STATE AND OUTSIDE THE COUNTRY, IF NEED BE, TO ENABLE THE CO - OPERATORS OF THE STATE TO HAVE A FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF THE CO - OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT IN SUCH PLACES; (XXIII) TO CONDUCT EXAMINATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION OF THE EMPLOYEES OF THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, IF REQUIRED; (XXIV) TO GENERALLY UNDERTAKE ALL SUCH OTHER ACTIVITIES AS ARE INCIDENTAL TO OR CONDUCIVE TO THE ATTAINMENT OF THE ABOVE OBJECTIVES. 9. FOLLOWING THE TRIBUNAL ORDER IN ASSESSEE'S OWN CASE FOR A.YS. 2006 - 07 & 2005 - 06 (SUPRA), WE SET ASIDE THE ORDE R OF CIT (APPEALS) ON THIS ISSUE AND RESTORE THE ORDER OF ASSESSING OFFICER IN THIS REGARD. THIS GROUND OF APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 10. THE LAST GROUND IN ITA NOS.865 & 866/BANG/2019 FOR THE A.YS. 2014 - 15 & 2015 - 16 IS IN RESPECT OF DISALLOWING DEDUCTION CLAIMED UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT ON INTEREST EARNED FROM SAVINGS BANK ACCOUNT KEPT WITH THE CO - OPERATIVE BANKS ON THE GROUND OF INVESTMENTS ARE MADE IN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES. 11. THE FACTS OF THE CASE ARE THAT THE ASSESSEE RECEIVED INTERE ST ON SAVINGS BANK ACCOUNT KEPT WITH THE CO - OPERATIVE BANKS, THE SAME ARE DISALLOWED BY THE LOWER AUTHORITIES ON THE REASON THAT INTEREST RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE IS ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT ONLY WHEN IT IS RECEIVED FROM CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY OTHER THAN INTEREST RECEIVED FROM SAVINGS BANK ACCOUNT. 16 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 12. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE MATERIAL ON RECORD. THE LEARNED AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE SUBMITTED THAT AS PER THE DECISION OF HON'BLE JURISDICTIONAL KAR NATAKA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF GUTTIGEDARARA CREDIT CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED VS. ITO 377 ITR 464 AND ALSO IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. TOTAGARS CO - OPERATIVE SALES SOCIETY LTD. 392 ITR 74 (KAR), THE INTEREST RECEIVED BY THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FROM DE POSIT KEPT WITH CO - OPERATIVE BANK IS ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT. THE LEARNED AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE RELIED ON THE DECISION OF BANGALORE BENCH OF TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF ME NASI SEEMAYA GROUP GRA MANGALA SEVA SANGHE NIYAMITA VS. DCIT IN ITA NOS.609 & 610/BANG/2014 . HOWEVER, THE D.R. IS OF THE OPINION THAT THE INTEREST RECEIVED ON SAVINGS BANK ACCOUNT IS NOT IN A CCORDANCE WITH ABOVE JUDGMENTS . IN OUR OPINION, AS PER THE SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT, THE ONLY CONDITION FOR AV AILING THE DEDUCTION UNDER THIS PROVISION IS ANY INCOME BY WAY OF INTEREST OR DIVIDEND DERIVED BY THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FROM ITS INVESTMENT WITH ANY OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY, THE WHOLE OF SUCH INCOME IS ALLOWABLE AS A DEDUCTION. THEREFORE THERE IS NO CONDITION FOR THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY TO INVEST IN FIXED DEPOSITS ONLY. AS REGARDS THE CO - OPERATIVE BANK SHALL BE TREATED AS CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FOR THE PURPOSE OF INTEREST INCOME ON INVESTMENT IN SUCH CO - OPERATIVE BANK UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT . I T WAS DECIDED BY THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE TOTGARA CO - OPERATIVE SALES SOCIETY LTD. CITED SUPRA THAT WHILE IN TERPRETING THE SECTION 80P(2)(A ) OF THE ACT, THE SURPLUS FUND NOT IMMEDIATELY REQUIRE FOR THE BUSINESS AND 17 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 INVESTED IN SHORT TERM DEPOSIT W OULD BE ASSESSABLE UNDER THE HEAD INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES WHERE THE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ENGAGED IN CARRYING IN THE BUSINESS OF BANKING ARE PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS AND CONSEQUENTLY NO DEDUCTION IS ALLOWABLE UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(A)( I) OF THE ACT . W HEREAS IN THE CASE BEFORE US, THE ISSUE IS WHETHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY WHICH IS DERIVED INCOME ON INVESTMENT WITH THE CO - OPERATIVE BANK IS ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT PROVIDES DEDUCTION IN RESPECT OF INCOME BY WAY OF INTEREST OR DIVIDEND ON INVESTMENT MADE WITH OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES. AS PER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT, IF THE INCOME IS INCLUDED IN TOTAL INCOME THEN THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY IS ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT. IN OTHER WORDS, TO AVAIL DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D)(I) OF THE ACT , IF THE ASSESSEE CARRIES ON BUSINESS OF THE BANKING OR PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS AND IT MUST HAVE I NCOME OF INTEREST OR DIVIDEND ON INVESTMENT WITH OTHER CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES MAY OR MAY NOT ENGAGE IN BAN KING PROVIDING CREDIT FACILITIES TO ITS MEMBERS AND THE HEAD UNDER WHICH THE INCOME IS ASSESSABLE IS NOT MATERIAL FOR THE CLAIM O F DEDUCTION UNDER THE SAID SECTION. THE SOCIETY HAVING SURPLUS FUNDS WHICH ARE INVESTED IN SAVINGS BANK ACCOUNT AND THE INCOME IS INCLUDED TOTAL , THE ASSESSEE IS ENTITLED FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT. BEING SO, WE DIRECT THE ASSESSING OFFICER TO GRANT THE DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT. EVEN THE DEPOSITS IN S.B ACCOUNT IS ALSO AN INVESTMENT B Y THE ASSESSEE AND THE ASSESSEE HAS DEPOSITED 18 ITA NO S.864, 865 & 866/BANG/2019 SURPLUS FUNDS IN S.B. ACCOUNT SO AS TO MEET ITS URGENT NEEDS AND IT CANNOT BE SAID THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT ENTITLED TO DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P(2)(D) OF THE ACT. THIS GROUND OF APPEAL IS ALLOWED FOR THE A. YS 20 14 - 15 & 2015 - 16. 13. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL S OF THE ASSESSEE ARE PARTLY ALLOWED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONED ON THE CAPTION PAGE. SD/ - SD/ - ( N.V. VASUDEVAN ) ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) VICE PRESIDENT ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 3 .11. 20 20 . *REDDY GP COPY TO 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT (A) 4. PR. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME - TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE