Bhimprena Sanskrutik Kendra, Panvel V. Income Tax Officer, Exemption, Ward, Thane, Thane

ITA 866/PUN/2023

AI Insights

The case involves Bhim Prerna Sanskrutik Kendra, which filed appeals against the orders of the National Faceless Appellate Centre (NFAC) for the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20. The appeals were related to the denial of exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, due to the absence of an audit report in Form No. 10B, a prerequisite for claiming such exemptions. The NFAC had dismissed the appeals without a hearing, citing a CBDT Circular. The Tribunal found this dismissal to be in violation of the principles of natural justice and remanded the case for a fresh decision on merits.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 136186 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 month(s) 8 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 04-09-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Next Hearing Date: 03-09-2023
• Assessment Year: 2018-2019
• Appeal Filed On: 27-07-2023
• Laws Referred To: Income-tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: GANESH BUDRUK LD
• Assessee Lawyers: HARI KRISHAN LD
• Keywords: Principle of natural justice
• Section: 12; 11; 10B; 143(1); 250; 139(1)

Judgement Text

॥ आयकर अपीलीय न्यायाधिकरण, पुणे “एसएमसी” न्यायपीठ, पुणे में ॥ ITAT-Pune Page 1 of 4 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNE “SMC” BENCH, PUNE BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपऩल स ं . / ITA No. 866 & 867/PUN/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2018-19 & 2019-20 Bhim Prerna Sanskrutik Kendra, Plot No.136/A, Sector 15, New Panvel - 410206. PAN: AABTB0109Q . . . . . . .अपऩलधर्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/s Income Tax Officer, Exemptions Ward, Thane . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वधरध / Appearances Assessee by : Shri Hari Krishan [Ld. AR] Revenue by : Shri Ganesh Budruk [Ld. DR] स ु नवाई की तारीख / Date of conclusive Hearing : 04/09/2023 घोषणा की तारीख / Date of Pronouncement : 05/09/2023 आदेश / ORDER PER G. D. PADMAHSHALI, AM; These twin appeals of the assessee are instituted against separate orders of National Faceless Appellate Centre [‘NFAC’ hereinafter] passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [‘the Act’ hereinafter] vide DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/ 1053536000(1) & 1053536364(1) dt. 02/06/2023. [‘Impugned Order’ hereinafter] 2. Since substantive issue involved in both these appeals being common, at the request of rival parties hereof, these are taken up together for the sake of brevity and for a common & consolidated order. Bhim Prerna Sanskrutik Kendra ITA No.866 & 867/PUN/2023 ITAT-Pune Page 2 of 4 3. We first deal with ITA No. 866/PUN/2023 as lead case, resultantly, our adjudication laid in subsequent paragraphs shall mutatis-mutandis apply to ITA No. 867/PUN/2023. 4. Briefly stated facts of both the cases are; 4.1 The assessee for assessment year 2018-19 [‘AY hereinafter] filed its return of income [‘ITR’ hereinafter] on 12/10/2018 declaring total income at ₹51,220 after claiming exemption of ₹21,89,048/- u/s 11 & 12 of the Act. 4.2 The ITR was summarily processed determining total income of the assessee at ₹22,40,263/- u/s 143(1) of the Act on account of denial of exemption in the absence of audit report i.e. Form No. 10B which was one of the condition precedent for claiming exemption u/s 11 & 12 of the Act. 4.3 Aggrieved assessee assailed said denial on legal as well meritare grounds before first appellate authority u/s 246A(1) of the Act, which came to be dismissed owning to assessee’s failure to furnish audit report in Form No. 10B within the prescribed due date u/s 139(4A) r.w.s. 139(1) of the Act. 4.4 In the aforestated circumstance, the assessee brought up grievance in the present appeal before the Tribunal effectively on twin grounds viz; (i) Violation of principle of natural justice for adjudicating the matter without first service the notice of hearing. (ii) Failure to decide the case on merits. Bhim Prerna Sanskrutik Kendra ITA No.866 & 867/PUN/2023 ITAT-Pune Page 3 of 4 5. During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR without touching merits of the case, at the outset pressing into service ground number 1 of appeal memo submitted that, the impugned order has suffered from violation of principle of natural justice as the Ld. NFAC placing reliance on CBDT Circular No. 03/2020 dt. 03/01/2020 has straightway dismissed the appeal without putting a single notice of hearing to the assessee. The Ld. AR further contended that, the Ld. FAA came to dismiss the appeal perfunctorily without adjudicating the matters on merits even, for the reasons; the matter requires reconsideration at first appellate stage, thus prayed for remand to the file of Ld. NFAC. Per contra the Ld. DR could hardly controvert the factual position solidified by impugned order. 6. Heard rival contentions and perused the material placed on record in light of rule 18 of ITAT-Rules 1963. 7. Ostensibly from the face of the impugned order, we find that, while adjudicating the issue the Ld. NFAC did serve not even a single notice and provide an opportunity to the appellant of being heard or an opportunity to adduce evidential material in support of grounds raised in an appeal. We also note that, the impugned first appellate proceedings ceased without first identifying therein points of determination, decision thereon and reasoning therefore in terms of provision of s/s (6) of section 250 of the Act, thus the impugned order in our considered view has also suffered therefrom. Bhim Prerna Sanskrutik Kendra ITA No.866 & 867/PUN/2023 ITAT-Pune Page 4 of 4 8. For the aforestated reasons, without commenting on merits of the case, we set-aside the impugned order and remand the matter back to the file of Ld. NFAC for de-novo adjudication with a direction to accord not more than three effective hearings to the appellant assessee and to pass a speaking order in terms of section 250(6) of the Act. Thus both the grounds stands adjudicated accordingly. 13. In result, twin appeals of the assessee are ALLOWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSE. In terms of rule 34 of ITAT Rules, the order pronounced in the open court on this Tuesday, 05 th day of September, 2023. -S/d- -S/d- PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY G. D. PADMAHSHALI JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER पुणे / PUNE ; दिन ांक / Dated : 05 th day of September, 2023. आदेशकी प्रधिधलधप अग्रेधिि / Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1.अपील र्थी / The Appellant. 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent. 3. The NFAC, New Delhi (India) 4. The CIT-1, Thane, 5. DR, ITAT, Pune Bench ‘SMC’, Pune 6.ग र्डफ़ इल / Guard File Ashwini आिेश नुस र / By Order वररष्ठ दनजी सदिव / Sr. Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय न्य य दिकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.