, , , , A, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT AHMEDABAD, A BENCH . .. . . .. . , !' !' !' !', , , , #$ #$ #$ #$ # ## #. .. .% %% % . .. .&'( &'( &'( &'(, , , , %) * %) * %) * %) * % ' % ' % ' % ' BEFORE S/SHRI G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT AND A. K. GARODIA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) ITA NO.874/AHD/2013 [ASSTT.YEAR : 2008-2009] SHRI AMRUTLAL CHHOTUBHAI PATEL 273, KAMALA BHAVAN NAVA FALIYA, KATARGAM SURAT 395 004. /VS. ITO, WARD-8(1) SURAT. ( (( (,- ,- ,- ,- / APPELLANT) ( (( (./,- ./,- ./,- ./,- / RESPONDENT) 01 2 3 %/ ASSESSEE BY : NONE * 2 3 %/ REVENUE BY : SHRI O.P. BATHEJA, SR. DR 5 2 16)/ DATE OF HEARING : 15 TH JULY, 2013 7&8 2 16)/ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 02-08-2013 %9 / O R D E R PER G.C. GUPTA, VICE-PRESIDENT: THIS APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE COMMISSIONER OF I NCOME-TAX (APPEALS)- V, SURAT DATED 22.1.2013. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE-APPELLAN T AT THE TIME OF HEARING. ON THE PREVIOUS DATE OF HEARING I.E. ON 2 9 TH MAY, 2013 ALSO NOBODY APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSE SSEE HAS NOT INTIMATED REASON FOR NON-ATTENDANCE NOR FILED ANY A PPLICATION. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT IS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSING ITS APPEAL. THEREFORE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF D ELHI BENCH IN THE CASE ITA NO874/AHD/2013 -2- OF MULTIPLAN (INDIA) LTD. 38 ITD 320, WE DISMISS TH E APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON THE DATE MENTIONE D HEREINABOVE. SD/- SD/- ( # ## #. .. .% %% % . .. .&'( &'( &'( &'( /A.K. GARODIA) %) * /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ( . .. . . .. . /G.C. GUPTA) !' !' !' !' /VICE-PRESIDENT VK* C OPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1) : APPELLANT 2) : RESPONDENT 3) : CIT(A) 4) : CIT CONCERNED 5) : DR, ITAT. BY ORDER DR/AR, ITAT, AHMEDABAD