Rajyalakshmi Gillella, Yerraguntla, , Kadapa V. ITO, Ward-1, Proddutur, Kadapa

ITA 879/HYD/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 108 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7592 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 9 month(s) 26 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-03-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: DB-A
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 22-05-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: PHANENDRA SUSARLA
• Section: 263

Judgement Text

1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH A, HYDERABAD (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) BEFORE SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 879/HYD/2017 A.Y. 2009 - 10 RAJYALAKSHMI GILLELLA, YERRAGUNTLA. PAN: ACTPG 9092 R VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2, PRODDATUR. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ` ASSESSEE BY: SHRI PHANENDRA SUSARLA REVENUE BY: SHRI SUNIL KUMAR PANDEY, DR DATE OF HEARING: 16/03/2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 18 /03/2021 ORDER PER A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, A.M: THIS APPEAL IS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KURNOOL, DATED 15/03/2017 PASSED U/S. 263 OF THE ACT FOR THE A.Y. 2009 - 10. 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. AR FOR THE ASSESSEE PLACED BEFORE US LETTER DATED 11 /03/2021 AND SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE GOT RELIEF ON MERITS IN THE CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS THAT ENSUED PURSUANT TO THE ORDER PASSED WHICH IS IM PUGNED IN THE PRESENT APPEAL. THEREFORE , THE ASSESSEE DESIRES TO WITHDRAW HER PRESENT APPEAL. THE RELEVANT PORTION 2 FROM THE ASSESSEES LETTER (SUPRA) IS EXTRACTED HEREIN BELOW FOR REFERENCE: - THE ABOVE APPEAL IS FILED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15/03/2017 PA SSED BY THE LD. PR. CIT EXERCISING JURISDICTION UNDER SECTION 263 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961. THE APPELLANT GOT RELIEF ON MERITS IN THE CONSEQUENTIAL PROCEEDINGS THAT ENSUED PURSUANT TO THE ORDER PASSED WHICH IS IMPUGNED IN THE PRESENT APPEAL. IN VIEW O F THE ABOVE, THE APPELLANT DESIRES TO WITHDRAW HER PRESENT APPEAL. IT IS PRAYED THAT THE HONBLE TRIBUNAL MANY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THE APPELLANT TO WITHDRAW APPEAL AND OBLIGE. 3. ON PERUSAL OF THE LETTER DATED 11 /03/2021 FILED BY THE ASSESSEE SEEKING PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW HER PRESENT APPEAL AND ALSO CONSIDERING THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVES NO OBJECTION ON THIS REGARD, WE PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW HER APPEAL. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WIT HDRAWN. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 18 TH MARCH, 2021. SD/ - SD/ - ( SMT. P. MADHAVI DEVI ) ( A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER HYDERABAD, DATED: 18 TH MARCH , 2021. OKK COPY TO: - 1) SHRI G. RAJYA LAKSHMI, C/O. A.V. RAGHU RAM, P. VINOD & M. NEELIMA DEVI, ADVOCATES, 610, BABUKHAN ESTATE, BASHEERBAGH, HYDERABAD - 1. 2) INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2, PRODDATUR. 3) THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KURNOOL. 4) THE DR, ITAT, HYDERABAD 5) GUARD FILE