1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PATNA BENCH:P ATNA BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 88/PAT/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008-09 PARAS NATH SINGH, PROPRIETOR M/S. PUSHPAK ENTERPRISES, MOH: DHANAUIT, MORAI ROAD, GANGA BRIDGE COLONY, HAJIPUR, VAISHALI (PAN: AIAPS8489H) / V/S . ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-CIRCLE-1, PATNA. /APPELLANT .. /RESPONDENT /BY APPELLANT SHRI A. K. RASTOGI, ADVOCATE /BY RESPONDENT SHRI SANJAY SHIVAM, CIT, DR /DATE OF HEARING 10-04-2017 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 10-04-2017 /O R D E R PER BENCH: THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS ARISING OUT OF REVISION ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-1, PATNA DATED 05-10-2012 PASSED U/S. 26 3 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE ACT) FOR AY 2008- 09. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSE SSEE SUBMITTED THAT DURING THE PENDENCY OF THE AFORESAID APPEAL BEFORE TRIBUNAL, T HE AO PASSED ORDER U/S. 144 READ WITH SECTION 143(3) READ WITH SECTION 263 OF THE ACT ON 20.03.2014. ASSESSEE HAS ALREADY FILED APPEAL AGAINST THE SAID ORDER BEFORE THE LD. CIT(A) HENCE, THE CAUSE OF ACTION HAS COME TO AN END AND HE PRAYED BEFORE THE BENCH TO WITHDRAW T HE AFOREASAID APPEAL. LD. SR. DR HAS NOT OBJECTED TO THE SAME. HENCE, WE PERMIT TO WITHD RAW THIS APPEAL. 3. IN THE RESULT, ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT. SD/- SD/- (WASEEM AHMED) (ABY. T. VARKEY) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE: 10TH AP RIL, 2017 JD. SR. PS 2 ITA NO. 88/PAT/2014 PARAS NATH SINGH, AY: 2008-09 / COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO:- 1. / APPELLANT 2. / RESPONDENT 3. ' / CONCERNED CIT 4. ' - / CIT (A) 5. # && , / DR, ITAT, PATNA 6. ( / GUARD FILE. BY ORD ER/ , ASSISTANT REGI STRAR, ITAT, PATNA,