DE BEERS UK LTD ( FORMLERY KNWONA AS THE DIAMOND TRADING CO LTD), MUMBAI V. DDIT (IT) 1(2), MUMBAI

ITA 8829/MUM/2010

• Counselvise Citation: [2014] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 75695 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 2 month(s) 20 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-03-2014
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: L
• Next Hearing Date: 07-11-2013
• Assessment Year: 2002-2003
• Appeal Filed On: 16-12-2010
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: NIRAJA PRADHAN

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL L BENCH, MUMBAI . . , . , ! BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JM AND RAJENDRA, AM ./ I.T.A. NO.8829/MUM/2010 ( ' ' ' ' # # # # / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2002-03 ./ I.T.A. NO.8830/MUM/2010 ( ' ' ' ' # # # # / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2003-04 ./ I.T.A. NO.8824/MUM/2010 ( ' ' ' ' # # # # / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05 DE BEERS UK LIMITED, (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE DIAMOND TRADING COMPANY LIMITED), C/O. M/S. S.R. BATLIBOI & CO., 18 TH FLOOR, EXPRESS TOWERS, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400021 ' ' ' ' / VS. THE DY. DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) -1(2), SCINDIA HOUSE, MUMBAI. $ ./ % ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AACCT 5530B ( $& / APPELLANT ) .. ( '($& / RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : SHRI VI JAY VAIDYA RESPONDENT BY : SMT. NIRAJA PRADHAN ' ) *+ / DATE OF HEARING : 05/03/2014 ,-# ) *+ / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 05/03/2014 . / O R D E R PER BENCH: THESE APPEALS ARE DIRECTED AGAINST THREE SEPA RATE ORDERS DATED 13/10/2010 PASSED BY LD. CIT(A)-10, MUMBAI FOR A SSESSMENT YEARS 2002- 03, 2003-04 AND 2005-05. I.T.A. NO.8829,8830 &8824/MUM/2010 2 2. DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING LD. AR OF THE ASSES SEE HAS FILED A LETTER DATED 4/3/2014 REQUESTING FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APP EALS. THE CONTENTS OF THE SAID LETTER ARE AS UNDER: WE REFER TO THE HEARING SCHEDULED ON 5 MARCH 2014 IN THE AFORESAID APPEALS BEFORE THE INCOME- TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI ( ITAT) BENCH L IN CASE OF DBUK FOR A.Y 2002-03, A.Y 2003-04 AND A.Y 2004-05. IN THIS REGARD, WE ON BEHALF AND UNDER INSTRUCTIONS FROM DBUK WISH TO STATE THAT DBUK WISHES TO WITHDRAW THE SUBJECT APPEALS F OR A.Y 2002-03, A.Y. 2003-04 AND A.Y 2004-05 ON A WITHOUT PREJUDICE BASI S. WE REQUEST YOU TO ALLOW THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW TH E APPEAL AND OBLIGE. LD. DR DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO SUCH REQUEST O F THE ASSESSEE. ACCORDINGLY, THE WITHDRAWAL WAS PERMITTED AND APPE ALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. IN THE RESULT, ALL THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSES SEE ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 05/03/2014 . . ) ,-# / 0'1 05/03/2014 - ) 2 SD/- SD/- (RAJENDRA) . . (I.P.BANSAL) /ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 0' DATED 05/03/2014 . ' . .VM , SR. PS I.T.A. NO.8829,8830 &8824/MUM/2010 3 . . . . ) )) ) '*3 '*3 '*3 '*3 43#* 43#* 43#* 43#* / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. $& / THE APPELLANT 2. '($& / THE RESPONDENT. 3. 5 ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 4. 5 / CIT 5. 362 '*' , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 27 8 / GUARD FILE. .' .' .' .' / BY ORDER, (3* '* //TRUE COPY// 9 99 9 / : : : : (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI