RAJ KUMAR MEHTA, Jaipur V. ACIT, Jaipur

ITA 883/JPR/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 127 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2075 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 11 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 05-09-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2007-2008
• Appeal Filed On: 03-10-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: R A VERMA CIT DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: S L PODDAR

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH HKKXPUN] YS[KK LNL; ,OA JH DQY HKKJR] U;KF;D LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, AM AND SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 638/JP/2016 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2012-13. SHRI RAVI AGARWAL, 9, JAMNA LAL BAJAJ MARG, C-SCHEME, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WRD 6(2), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. AAYPA 5714 D VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 883/JP/2016 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08. SHRI RAJ KUMAR MEHTA 1590, SINGHI JI KA RASTA, JOHARI BAZAR, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. ACFPM 8564 N VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 204/JP/2014 & 72/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 & 12-13. SHRI AMIT KOTAWALA, PROP. M/S. AUTHENTIC STONE TRADING CO., 9, JAMNA LAL BAJAJ MARG, C-SCHEME, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(3)/WARD 5(4), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN NO. A BZPK 2229 F VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI S.L. PODDAR (ADVOCATE) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SHRI R.A. VERMA (ADDL. CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 04.09.2017. ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 05/09/2017. 2 ITA NOS. 638/JP/16, 883/JP/16, 204/JP/14 & 72/JP/17 2 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM. AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THESE APPEALS, LD. COUNSE L FOR THE ASSESSEE SUBMITTED THAT ON THE INSTRUCTION OF THE ASSESSEES, HE WISH TO WITHDRAW ALL THESE APPEALS. IN TOKEN OF HAVING WITHDRAWN THESE APPEA LS, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS PUT HIS SIGNATURE ON THE GROUNDS OF AP PEAL. THEREFORE, HE REQUESTED THAT ASSESSEE MAY BE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THESE APPE ALS. 2. THE LD. D/R HAS NOT OBJECTED TO THE WITHDRAWAL O F THESE APPEALS. 3. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PA RTIES. THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THESE APPEALS. WE, THEREFORE, D ISMISS ALL THESE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEALS OF THE ASSESSES ARE DISMI SSED. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 05.09.2 017. SD/- SD/- ( HKKXPUN ( DQY HKKJR ) ( BHAGCHAND) ( KUL BHARAT ) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER JAIPUR DATED:- 05/09/2017. DAS/ VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT- SHRI RAVI AGARWAL, JAIPUR, SHRI RAJ KUMAR MEHTA, JAIPUR. SHRI AMIT KOTAWALA, JAIPUR. 2. THE RESPONDENT THE ITO WARD 2, JAIPUR/THE ACIT CIRCLE-1, JAIPUR, THE ITO WARD 6(3), JAIPUR. 3. THE CIT(A). 4. THE CIT, 5. THE DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 638/JP/2016, 883/JP/16, 204/ JP/2014 & 72/JP/2017) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR 3 ITA NOS. 638/JP/16, 883/JP/16, 204/JP/14 & 72/JP/17 3