IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. H. S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND, SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) ITA NO.888/DEL/2016 (FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12) SRS MARKETING D-236, 1 ST FLOOR, ASHOK VIHAR, PHASE-1, NEW DELHI 110 052 PAN NO. ABFFS 3448 E VS. ITO, WARD 33(2), NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) A SSESSEE BY MS. UMANG LUTHRA, C.A. RE VENUE BY SH. PRAKASH DUBY, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING: 15 / 1 2 /2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 16 / 1 2 /2020 ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM: THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.01.2016 OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (A)- 17, NEW DELHI RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12. 2. BEFORE US, ASSESSEE HAS MOVED AN APPLICATION DATED 14 TH DECEMBER 2020 WHEREIN THE ASSESSEE HAS STATED THAT IT HAS OPTED FOR VIVAD SE VISHWAS (VSV) 2020 AND HAS FILED THE DECLARATION ITA NO.888/DEL/2016 SRS MARKETING VS. ITO A.Y. 2011-12 2 (FORM-1) AND UNDERTAKING (FORM-2) SCHEME AND HAD REQUESTED TO ALLOW THE WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. 3. AFTER CONSIDERING THE REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE AS WITHDRAWN SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT THAT IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED ASSESSMENT YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUNAL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICATION APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. WITH THESE DIRECTIONS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 16.12.2020 SD/- SD/- (H. S. SIDHU) (ANIL CHATURVEDI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER *PRITI YADAV, SR.PS* DATE:- 16.12.2020 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI